Contrary to popular beliefs, if min.wage is implemented in SG, the people tt would benefit most is not Singaporean, it will be the foreigners. Think abt e bulk of low wage industries, (construction, ship building, service such as retail, cleaner, F&B) these sectors are either pre-dominated by foreigners, due to cost pressure & job scopes attach to it. Raising current wage say $4/hr to $6/hr or even $10/hr, will not attract SG ppl to do but more foreigners to to it. Since from a biz point, I needa increase e work to cover my costs (b4 I concede defeat & fold e biz if I cant make profit), so who will e biz hire? A sg ppl, likely age 40+ (due to ageing population? younger ppl bulk r probably in other office sectors since they r more preferred also), leaving our low skilled, senior SG ppl vs younger, low skilled foreigner? Biz will still tk e foreigner, since they r tougher, could do more.
Even if foreigner is not allowed to takeup e higher min.wage jobs, e natural effect will simply by higher inflation, since higher cost, same productivity simply leads to higher price (inflation) or folding of uncompetitive biz (creative destruction?), e individuals still get hurt unless they innovate tru productivity like machinery or work more to earn more...
Levelling e field is impossible w min.wage, increasing productivity is e key, but I mus admit, biz will always take easy way out. So more pressures could be applied say levy on hiring of foreigners (but maybe not across e board, esp.sectors like cleaner, ship building & construction which need foreign labours since locals wont do them). 2 tiers levy will be hard to implement, so e current local to foreign ratios could be played alittle to hopefully achieve e intended effect. Some carrots like grants should be into more across e board instead of dominated among a handful of bigger bizs in SG. A newsletter sharing on productivity, could be shared among all active entities via ACRA instead of e current NTUC, SNEF...etc. which favours their members bizs, but left out e varied non-members SMEs.
In short, I m not into min.wage, I think its a fanciful concept like welfare benefits, taking care of e poor, disabled etc. tt sound good but economically disaster to maintain over long term. I m more of e protestant ethics type, u work to earn your keep.
Lastly, tot this thread is abt SMRT? But lately it seems to be on Macro, economics, workforce topics? Possible to create a topic on tt, & maybe bring bk e SMRT discussion here?
(29-09-2013, 02:10 PM)Temperament Wrote: [ -> ]Any who wants to work should have a job. Yes can the job sustain at least his board and lodging. No matter how simple and humble his may be. Maybe for his food and not lodging?
So why countries have minimum wage for a job?
What are the pros and cons?
i think Malaysia and HK just have minimum wage recently.
Why they can and we couldn't?
i think minimum wage means no "escape"(cheap labour) for employers anymore.
Ha! Ha!