(06-01-2012, 10:30 PM)Bibi Wrote: [ -> ]She also holds some 14 directorships with SMRT's subsidiary companies. Gosh! 14 directorships. How to handle? We commoner want to do part-time job have to declare to our company this and that. This lady holds 14 of them.
I am guessing the companies are part of the larger SMRT Group which she presided over ? I believe there is nothing unusual about that ?
14 directorships to shake legs and la kopi each quarter is it?
14 director fees were paid also. Huat ah.
The Straits Times
Jan 7, 2012
SMRT chief quits
By Christopher Tan
BELEAGUERED SMRT Corp chief executive Saw Phaik Hwa resigned yesterday, a month after two massive train breakdowns made the transport operator the focus of public ire.
Her move was not entirely unexpected to some, except for its timing: three days before Parliament sits to address a barrage of questions from MPs on the Dec 15 and 17 breakdowns, and well before three separate investigations into the train disruptions are fully under way.
In a long e-mail to SMRT staff in the late afternoon yesterday, the 57-year- old CEO known for her colourful hair and lifestyle announced her resignation, which took immediate effect.
The company made two brief statements to the Singapore Exchange saying she had quit as chief executive and as a director of SMRT.
In another statement, sent to the media at close to 7pm, SMRT's board of directors said it had accepted Ms Saw's resignation, but that she would be around to assist the Committee of Inquiry (COI) investigating last month's rail breakdowns. She will also help with the company's leadership transition.
Board member Tan Ek Kia, 63, a chartered engineer who was formerly with oil giant Shell, will stand in as the interim chief, focusing on SMRT's rail operations as it looks for a new chief executive.
The media statement made little reference to the breakdowns in December which affected more than 200,000 commuters and resulted in chaotic scenes.
SMRT chairman Koh Yong Guan said Ms Saw's decision to quit pre-dated the disruptions.
'On Dec 7, Phaik Hwa spoke to me about her desire to move on during 2012, after having served nine years and led SMRT through considerable growth,' he said.
New businesses had also been created, he said, and the company had 'delivered strong results' during Ms Saw's nine-year tenure.
He thanked the retailer-turned-rail chief for her dedicated service.
In the statement, Ms Saw said that she acknowledged the time was right for the board to look at new leadership.
She said she had the privilege of leading a group of very committed and loyal staff over the last nine years.
'I feel it is now time for SMRT to bring in new leadership and take the organisation to the next level. This is the culmination of a discussion I began with the chairman in early December,' she said.
She also said it was 'important for me to stay on and support the relevant inquiries, and the transition to new leadership'.
Mr Tan said he would work quickly to ensure the leadership team of SMRT has whatever support it needs to ensure the delivery of reliable public transport services to commuters.
In the only reference to the breakdown, he said: 'The staff of SMRT are aware of public expectations that we deliver on our commitment to learn lessons from December's incidents. My focus will be on ensuring that we meet our commitment to provide reliable public transport services. I will put a particular emphasis on rail as the cornerstone of our public transport system.'
Ms Saw's resignation comes after her comments on Dec 18, a day after last month's second breakdown, that she was staying put despite a public clamour for her to step down.
'As CEO of SMRT, I am naturally responsible,' she said. 'Being responsible does not mean walking away from these faults. It means doing all I can to get the problem fixed.'
She declined to comment yesterday.
Reacting to the news that she had stepped down, Public Transport Council chairman Gerard Ee said: 'It's a bit premature. She should have stayed to wait for the outcome of the COI.
•Resignation takes immediate effect
•Board member to stand in as interim CEO
'But her resignation will take some heat off the company. From that perspective, I admire her move because she's claiming responsibility, saying that the buck stops with her.'
Transport analyst John Rachmat, of the Royal Bank of Scotland Asia Securities, said Ms Saw's resignation should not come as a big surprise to investors.
'Her position had become untenable even before the December incidents,' he said, referring to her handling of previous breakdowns and incidents like the two cases of vandalised trains and worsening crowds.
But he added that she could not be blamed for everything, noting that soaring commuter numbers and the trains' inability to run at a higher frequency were not entirely SMRT's doing.
Ms Saw's failing, he said, was her poor public relations skills.
'Having said that, I am not optimistic SMRT can find a better CEO.'
Those who have worked with Ms Saw paint a picture of a boss who leads with an iron fist.
A former senior executive said: 'She's quite tough and impatient to get results.'
Commenting on a slew of mid- and high-level resignations during her tenure, the executive said: 'She's a bit unforgiving to the senior people.
'That was one of her mistakes. Those people who left had a lot of experience and a lot of linkage to the ground staff. Now, there are not many second-liners with a bird's eye view of things. That's not healthy for a company.'
The Land Transport Authority was not available for official comment, but directors and former directors of the authority were surprised by Ms Saw's departure, just as some were slightly taken aback when she was appointed in 2002, given her non-engineering background.
Ms Saw was previously with duty- free retail chain DFS Venture Singapore, and has a degree in biochemistry.
'But our relationship with her had always been cordial,' said a former LTA executive. 'There were issues now and again, but other than that, it was okay.'
christan@sph.com.sg
SMRT is a biz that any idiot can run, demand is always there, supported by LTA, ....and yet, she can screw it up like that? :O
(07-01-2012, 02:40 PM)brattzz Wrote: [ -> ]SMRT is a biz that any idiot can run, demand is always there, supported by LTA, ....and yet, she can screw it up like that? :O
I believe just the thought that any idiot can run SMRT leads to the problem we are facing today. It is definitely not a business any idiot can run.
The latest result shows that expenses arising from the recent MRT disruptions incurred in 3Q FY2012 were not significant, but I guess shareholders need to set aside an amount to reflect their own take of the monetary penalty, which will surely be imposed.
(07-01-2012, 07:43 AM)Musicwhiz Wrote: [ -> ]A former senior executive said: 'She's quite tough and impatient to get results.'
Commenting on a slew of mid- and high-level resignations during her tenure, the executive said: 'She's a bit unforgiving to the senior people.
'That was one of her mistakes. Those people who left had a lot of experience and a lot of linkage to the ground staff. Now, there are not many second-liners with a bird's eye view of things. That's not healthy for a company.'
This is the real reason of the failure. Lesson learnt.
(07-01-2012, 07:43 AM)Musicwhiz Wrote: [ -> ]'Those people who left had a lot of experience and a lot of linkage to the ground staff. Now, there are not many second-liners with a bird's eye view of things. That's not healthy for a company.'
Could it be a microcosm of .... like if you substitute 'company' in the above quoted paragraph with .... well.
(31-01-2012, 06:07 PM)wsreader Wrote: [ -> ]The latest result shows that expenses arising from the recent MRT disruptions incurred in 3Q FY2012 were not significant, but I guess shareholders need to set aside an amount to reflect their own take of the monetary penalty, which will surely be imposed.
Extracts fm
Results,
Pg 16 :
Expenses arising from the recent MRT disruptions incurred this quarter were not significant.
Pg 18 :
In the next 12 months, the profitability of the Train operations will also be impacted by the consequential costs arising from the recent MRT service disruptions.
Also, very likely SMRT will be doing a bond issue or borrow from the bank soon, I estimate $150Mil - $200Mil,
Pg 3 :
(b) Total liabilities increased by $164.3 million (20.3%) due mainly to higher trade and other payables ($282.3 million) and higher provisions ($6.9 million).
The increase in trade and other payables was attributable to the accrual for the 17 new trains which will be financed through operating cash flow and/or long term borrowings.
ie. Interest Expenses will erode profitability.
<Not Vested>