(02-05-2013, 06:10 PM)pubster Wrote: [ -> ]As such, I have hope to rethink the current situation more seriously. Currently I am comtemplating on the actions (or non-actions).
1) Continued to hold and just hope for some events (fare increase? other sources of revenues?) to increase its share price again?
2) Average down another 15-20k when the price seems to reach its bottom?
3) Sell off and registered the loss (around 6K, 20%)
For 1), the dividends is paying lesser than CPF so basically the cost of holding is increasing as time goes by. Of course, dividends might go up in the future...
For 2), the above reason to preventing me from averaging down, unless the price dropped to $1 which means the yield will be 2.5% which is the same as CPF... provided the dividend don't drop also in the future...
For 3), it is painful but if that must be done to stem further loss... I shall do it.
At a crossroad now... Hoping to hear some advices from the more experienced people here before making a decision...
I have learnt a lot by reading the kind contributions made in the forum. I hoped sometime in the future, I will be knowledgeable enough to contribute back to this forum. Thank you very much in advance for you kind advices.
Sorry to hear about your predicament.
The forward looking guidance by SMRT new CEO was not bright either, citing cost increases in staffs as well as maintainence costs.
The maintainence costs for operating the trains are large and obviously, someone somewhere must have been cost-cutting it to a bare minimum thus constant disruptions erupted.
We can expect more to come yet as not all issues are solved. Furthermore, the government seems intend to start introducing more competition into the public transport sector.
A duo-monopoly might become a monopolistic competitive sector.
Having said that, there is another strategy known as hedging, which I believe some forumers have discussed before.
By buying shorts on SMRT, you would be able to minimise your losses to a lesser extent. This can be done through CFD platforms.
However bear in mind that the following costs exist.
1. Financing costs
2. Dividends repayment costs ie. you pay out dividends from your shorts counter.
Also to bear in mind that whatever upward ticks in SMRT, you would incur losses on your shorts instead.
Thus, you might consider adjust ing your ratio proportion 60 (shorts):40 (longs) or 50:50.
Bearing in mind even 50:50 would incur you losses through the financing costs and dividend repayments as per mentioned above.
Not to mention the capital you invest into the shorts.
Ultimately, this is a hedging strategy and there will still be losses unless you double down on the right trend of SMRT for the next one year.
And finding the right ratio is also critical. But a 60:40 ratio would help in losses minimisation from my experience.
Hope this would trigger your thinking and perhaps help to minimise your losses onwards.