Big oil companies bracing for ‘ugly’ financial results
SARAH KENT THE WALL STREET JOURNAL APRIL 06, 2015 3:14PM
Big oil companies are preparing for “ugly” financial results following the drop in the price of crude. Source: Supplied
The world’s big oil companies and their investors are bracing for some of the worst quarterly financial results in recent memory as the first three months of the year closed with oil trading at about half of its 2014 peak.
The final quarter of 2014 was bad enough.
British giant BP announced its biggest quarterly loss since the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. Exxon Mobil Corp’s cash flow fell to its lowest level since the midst of the financial crisis in 2009.
The year-end carnage was for a three-month period in which a barrel of oil traded at $US77. In the latest quarter, the Brent international oil benchmark averaged $US55.13 a barrel.
“It’s going to be ugly,” said Jason Gammel, an analyst at Jefferies. “It’s going to be a really bad quarter.”
Most of the world’s biggest oil companies have already slashed spending, with many of them cutting jobs.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
MOREOil prices rebound in Asia
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
Underscoring the severity of the oil-price pressure, they have also turned to investors to help them preserve cash.
Eni SpA of Italy cut its dividend in March, a dramatic move within a group of companies that holds as almost sacred the ability to maintain steady payments to shareholders.
Royal Dutch Shell PLC and French giant Total SA recently said they would offer investors the option to receive their dividend in shares, a move that could bolster the companies’ cash holdings.
In February, Exxon said to cut costs it would reduce first-quarter spending on share buybacks by two-thirds from the preceding quarter to $US1 billion. Chevron Corp has suspended its buyback program altogether.
After a quarter of even lower oil prices, Big Oil is likely to continue to impose measures of austerity and negotiate better deals with contractors. Consultancy Wood Mackenzie estimates that by next year exploration costs will be driven down by about a third compared with 2014.
Companies are also working to cut operating costs, said Andrew Mackenzie, chief executive of BHP Billiton Ltd, the Anglo-Australian mining giant that also has a sizeable oil-and-gas arm.
“It’s going to be tightening the supply chain and sharing the pain,” Mr Mackenzie said in a recent interview.
Some cost cutting may show up when oil companies start reporting results later this month, providing some relief. BP and Shell are among the first big companies to report first-quarter earnings, on April 28 and April 30, respectively.
“I think you’ll find that when BP and Shell report results there will be quite a sharp revenue drop, but costs will have also fallen,” said Paul Mumford, a senior fund manager at Cavendish Asset management, which holds small stakes in both companies.
BP, Shell and Exxon referred questions to previous statements about how they are managing the weaker price environment. Chevron also noted previously announced plans to cut costs, reduce spending and pursue assets sales, while adding that it remains confident of its long-term business plans and its ability to manage the downturn.
Spending cuts are a Catch-22 for oil companies caught in a relentless race to replace the oil reserves they draw down every year. Reduce exploration spending too much, and companies run the risk of failing to line up new supplies to bolster their oil reserves, a closely watched metric for energy investors. And if they cut development costs too deeply, production suffers, affecting cash flow.
The pressure is acute. Chevron chairman and chief executive John Watson told analysts in March that the company’s negative returns for shareholders in 2014 were “unacceptable” and outlined “significant cost-reduction programs under way.” The company is rebidding contracts and negotiating reductions with suppliers, even as it works toward production growth of 20% by 2017.
To meet their substantial costs amid the price drop and fall in cash flow, companies have been piling on debt in recent months. According to Morgan Stanley, large integrated oil companies led by Exxon, Total, Chevron and BP raised $US31 billion in debt in the first two months of the year, beating the previous quarterly record of $US28 billion amassed at the height of the financial crisis in early 2009.
Loading up on debt isn’t necessarily a problem in the short term. Big integrated oil companies generate billions of dollars in cash each year and have substantial refining and trading arms that provide some cover in a low-price environment.
They have strong balance sheets and can take advantage of low borrowing costs. Morgan Stanley suggests that the enormous amount of debt Exxon, Chevron and others have taken on could signal that the oil majors have one eye on funding possible acquisitions.
With many in the industry expecting crude prices to start recovering in the second half of the year, some analysts are suggesting prices — and oil companies’ earnings — may have hit a floor in the just-ended quarter.
“The first quarter is going to be, I hope, the bottom of earnings for many years to come,” said Fadel Gheit, analyst at Oppenheimer.
Saudi able to increase it price of oil show that demand must be quite good. And with Iran still a long way to exporting it oil, oil can only go up hopefully. And not forgetting Yemen is still in hot spot.
(06-04-2015, 10:50 PM)Petertan Wrote: [ -> ]Saudi able to increase it price of oil show that demand must be quite good. And with Iran still a long way to exporting it oil, oil can only go up hopefully. And not forgetting Yemen is still in hot spot.
It could also mean that Saudi's have "cornered" more of the market share since last year and now pushing up prices marginally where they can.
Supply is still running at peak in US. There was some news of a small drop in production last week which if sustained may mean oil production in US has peaked.
Think the Saudi main aim is to make prices go much lower to make the US shale producer close shop. This they are not totally successful yet but we shall see in the coming months what is their next move.
I cannot but luv Goldman Sachs, are they just talking their books...
"Prices need to remain low in coming months to achieve a sufficient and sustainable slowdown in U.S. production growth," the bank said.
"The outlook for U.S. production in 2016 in turn leaves risk to our $65 per barrel forecast as skewed to the downside."
Goldman said that it expected U.S. crude stocks to peak in April but that inventories would likely rise again by October, putting downward pressure on prices into 2016.
The bank said U.S. output would grow by 700,000 barrels per day year-on-year in 2015, with sequential quarter-on-quarter growth of 170,000 barrels per day in the fourth quarter of 2015, at the current rig count.
GS
As discussed usually I don't bother to look at oil price because oil price is inherently unpredictable due to the geopolitical and cartel nature. I'm only interested this time round because of the shale production. Beyond 3Q15 I have no idea how it is going to pan out but I find it hard to believe in 4Q sequential growth in oil output based on CURRENT oil rig count which has basically halved from peak and back to 2011 levels. At least if GS says rig count going to recover in 2Q then at least it makes some sense.
Weaker USD, non event in Iran, Saudi raising price, US inventory growth is declining, US oil production looks peaked, capex likely to be cut further in coming results season... the fundy is there to see and Mr Market has already spoken with most oil stocks not doing lower low, even Petrobras.
Yemen is just noise.
(07-04-2015, 09:53 AM)specuvestor Wrote: [ -> ]As discussed usually I don't bother to look at oil price because oil price is inherently unpredictable due to the geopolitical and cartel nature. I'm only interested this time round because of the shale production. Beyond 3Q15 I have no idea how it is going to pan out but I find it hard to believe in 4Q sequential growth in oil output based on CURRENT oil rig count which has basically halved from peak and back to 2011 levels. At least if GS says rig count going to recover in 2Q then at least it makes some sense.
Weaker USD, non event in Iran, Saudi raising price, US inventory growth is declining, US oil production looks peaked, capex likely to be cut further in coming results season... the fundy is there to see and Mr Market has already spoken.
Yemen is just noise.
I have given different weight-age on those non-interested-party view e.g. IMF/WB, and interested-party view e.g. investment banks.
Anyway, I agree with your view.
I'm just putting down all these wild forecasts so that we can enjoy a laugh 9-12 months' later....
yes I know
I'm just a non-expert investigating it for a 12 months period and will abandon this thread and move on to other things that has structural or cyclical changes. So I probably have to laugh within the next 6 months or so
Thanks to HitandRun and Specuvestor for the amusement few months down the road.