I chose to put the article here. I am less concern on SingTel rating, but the view on spectrum allocation.
IMO, the allocation of 2.3 G may be more likely, because the expired 900 MHz spectrum may be more viable, to re-farm with adjacent spectrum, rather than early allocation to new operator...
(vested in M1)
Telco sector kept at ‘market weight’ by UOB Kay Hian; Singtel is top pick
SINGAPORE (June 11): Authorities are determined to facilitate the entry of a fourth mobile operator.
However, whether the 900MHz or 2,300MHz frequency band is allocated makes a big difference to the new entrant’s ability to compete.
In a sector report released on June 10, UOB ( Financial Dashboard) Kay Hian says it had expected a portion of the 900MHz frequency band to be set aside for potential new entrants.
“Contrary to our earlier expectations, we believe the authorities could consider allocating a portion of the 2,300MHz frequency to the fourth mobile operator,” it says.
The Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) has allowed incumbent mobile operators to utilise the 2300MHz frequency band on a short-term basis for trials on Time Division Duplex (TDD) technology.
Therefore, the 2,300MHz frequency band could be made available at a short notice.
The 900MHz frequency band provides longer range and better in-building coverage compared with the 2,300MHz frequency band.
“Thus, potential new entrants would have to fork out more capex to roll out their mobile network if IDA decides to set aside a portion of the 2,300MHz frequency band for the fourth mobile operator,” observes UOB Kay Hian.
“There is also speculation that IDA could embark on a new round of industry consultation focusing on issue pertaining to the introduction of a fourth mobile operator, such as frequency spectrum to be set aside and regulatory intervention to support a fourth mobile operator.”
...
http://www.theedgemarkets.com/sg/article...l-top-pick