24-06-2013, 05:16 PM
*hold my breath* d.o.g., maybe names should be kept SIC or changed to *ahem* protect the identities of the *ahem* victims. We had received two, erm, complaints before and I think this may warrant the third one coming.
(24-06-2013, 05:16 PM)psolhawk Wrote: [ -> ]*hold my breath* d.o.g., maybe names should be kept SIC or changed to *ahem* protect the identities of the *ahem* victims. We had received two, erm, complaints before and I think this may warrant the third one coming.
(24-06-2013, 03:35 PM)Boon Wrote: [ -> ]Corporate Tax Rate in PRC is 25%. Since interest expenses are tax deductible, therefore, it should be fully accounted for as well.
Also, the subscription price of RMB 100.5 million is for BOTH Bonds and Warrants.
Subscription Price of Bond (SPB) + Subscription Price of Warrants (SPW) = RMB 100.5 million
SPB + SPW = 100.5
Principal Amount of Bond (PAB) = RMB 134 million
Discount to PAB (DPAB) = PAB – SPB = PAB – 100.5 + SPW = 134 – 100.5 + SPW = 33.5 + SPW
Assuming DPAB could be amortized over two years with tax deductibility
SPW up < = > SPB down < = > DPAB up < = > tax deductible (TD) up < = > effective annual interest rate (EAIR) down
SPW (zero) < = > SPB (100.5) < = > DPAB (33.5) < = > EAIR (24%)
SPW (33.5) < = > SPB (67) < = > DPAB (67) < = > EAIR (20%)
See Excel File attached
It is hard to ascribe a “correct” Effective Annual Interest Rate” without knowing the full details of the deal plus the relevant allowable accounting and tax treatment in PRC. For those that know how to do it (I am not one), I believe there are many ways to structure this deal.
No doubt, this hybrid security could be “decomposed” into its basic building blocks or components - Bond and an Equity Option – and with each component being analyzed independently - the key thing in the first place is to get the building blocks right.
Comments are most welcomed.
(29-06-2013, 12:47 AM)greengreengrass Wrote: [ -> ]boon, are you saying the effective interest rate of 32% as calculated by d.o.g. was wrong?
(24-06-2013, 03:35 PM)Boon Wrote: [ -> ]Corporate Tax Rate in PRC is 25%. Since interest expenses are tax deductible, therefore, it should be fully accounted for as well.
Also, the subscription price of RMB 100.5 million is for BOTH Bonds and Warrants.
Subscription Price of Bond (SPB) + Subscription Price of Warrants (SPW) = RMB 100.5 million
SPB + SPW = 100.5
Principal Amount of Bond (PAB) = RMB 134 million
Discount to PAB (DPAB) = PAB – SPB = PAB – 100.5 + SPW = 134 – 100.5 + SPW = 33.5 + SPW
Assuming DPAB could be amortized over two years with tax deductibility
SPW up < = > SPB down < = > DPAB up < = > tax deductible (TD) up < = > effective annual interest rate (EAIR) down
SPW (zero) < = > SPB (100.5) < = > DPAB (33.5) < = > EAIR (24%)
SPW (33.5) < = > SPB (67) < = > DPAB (67) < = > EAIR (20%)
See Excel File attached
It is hard to ascribe a “correct” Effective Annual Interest Rate” without knowing the full details of the deal plus the relevant allowable accounting and tax treatment in PRC. For those that know how to do it (I am not one), I believe there are many ways to structure this deal.
No doubt, this hybrid security could be “decomposed” into its basic building blocks or components - Bond and an Equity Option – and with each component being analyzed independently - the key thing in the first place is to get the building blocks right.
Comments are most welcomed.
(23-06-2013, 12:15 PM)yeokiwi Wrote: [ -> ]If buying a stock requires such in-depth understanding, interpretation, postulation, guesstimation of the company intention of issuing the bonds, it is probably too much for me.
There are more than 700+ companies in SGX and there are countless that are easier to understand with a higher probability of capital preservation with gain.
Different stroke for different people. I prefer things that are easier to understand with a high probability of guessing the right intention/value.
(30-06-2013, 08:31 AM)HitandRun Wrote: [ -> ]Boon
I'm inclined to share the views of specuvestor as well.
Tax savings should be the appetizer, rather than the main course. Even if tax savings lower the effective interest rate to 15%, the question remains....