Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HRnetGroup
10-09-2019, 09:08 PM. (This post was last modified: 04-10-2019, 05:07 PM by dreamybear.)
Post: #21
RE: HRnetGroup
In HRnetGroup's latest quarter, Professional Recruitment forms 67% of gross profit and 52% of gross profit comes from SG.
(ref links in Post #16 results presentation slides)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Singapore job-seekers face weaker hiring prospects in Q4: Survey
Published Sep 10, 2019, 5:00 am SGT

Job seekers should expect a tighter labour market in the last three months of this year, as hiring prospects are down from both the current quarter as well as a year ago, based on survey results from a recruitment firm......

ManpowerGroup Singapore country manager Linda Teo said that business confidence here has been dampened by global and regional trade conflicts, as well as warnings of a possible recession.

"Anticipating that business will be affected by the economic downturn, companies are limiting their hiring activity. Some companies are also turning to upskilling their employees instead of hiring new staff," she said.....

Mr Kurt Wee, president of the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises, said smaller firms tend to be quite lean, and thus less elastic in hiring and firing than larger firms.

"But the general sentiment among all businesses is poor, and if the negative situation persists in the next one to two quarters, I wouldn't be surprised if SMEs start retrenching," he said.....

The eight Asia Pacific economies surveyed by ManpowerGroup still have positive hiring outlooks for the final quarter of this year, with the strongest anticipated by Japanese employers (+26 per cent) and the weakest reported in both Singapore and China (+4 per cent).

Read more : https://www.straitstimes.com/business/we...-q4-survey

Find Reply
04-10-2019, 09:32 PM. (This post was last modified: 04-10-2019, 10:41 PM by dreamybear.)
Post: #22
RE: HRnetGroup
(22-07-2019, 11:06 AM)karlmarx Wrote: There are also blue-collar workers that don't use or can't afford smartphones at all. A nifty "broadcast yourself" feature in Findjobs allows children to quickly help their parents indicate what jobs they are looking for and what experience they have.

Ivan said: "I went to many places - shopping malls, the MRT, washrooms. Whenever I see cleaners in the washroom, I ask them 'Auntie, Uncle, you looking for job?' "

"Everywhere I go, even hawker centres, I will approach these aunties and uncles as I'm a recruiter with customers that have hundreds of cleaner positions available and I couldn't depend on online."

He added that a mobile app means the job postings are always there, and the job seeker can be exposed to more job vacancies.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/life-cu...pokemon-go
...

Competition through new technology in the low-skilled employment market has emerged. If Grab can connect drivers with commuters, then a case can also be made for an online broker to connect employers and jobseekers. Of course, whether such apps can gain market share will depend on how successful it is in convincing both employers and jobseekers, to first come on board, and then perform an even better job, compared to the traditional agent, in satisfying their respective needs.

As you predicted earlier, more online brokers are jumping into the recruitment fray. It's a low barrier to entry bizness but I think the threat from bigger brokers in the likes of Uber may be more serious as they already have troves of data, they are established, their apps are familiar to people already, and thus likely to get up to speed faster. However, the online brokers will likely focus mainly on the "more straight fwd" jobs that require easy evaluation rather than the higher end(requiring complicated skills) jobs as the latter needs more complicated evaluations. Even then, there is a concurrent trend towards AI / automation which may reduce the no. of straight fwd / labour intensive / automatable jobs moving fwd. "disruption within disruption" ? I wld be curious to observe the impact of all these to Hrnet.

In the moblie app world, I think there cld be a convergence to a super/ mega app* (which companies like Singtel, Grab, Uber seem good candidates to come out with one.) which may take mkt share away from the recruitment industry's incumbents.

*https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2018/07/11/grab-wants-to-build-tencentlike-superapp/

----------------------------------

"RIDE-HAILING firm Uber Technologies Inc said it launched an app called Uber Works to connect temporary workers looking to work shifts with businesses trying to plug gaps in their rosters.

The app, made available only in Chicago for now, will show workers the available shifts in a certain area and help businesses that struggle to staff up during peak demand, and with missed shifts and high turnover, Uber said in a blog https: ubr.to/2n5ka15....."

Read mpre : https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/technol...businesses

Find Reply
05-10-2019, 11:03 AM.
Post: #23
RE: HRnetGroup
The ultimate goal for the large mobile apps is to dominate the market of 'everyday app usage over everything.' They want everything you do in your everyday-life to be done on their app. They won't only be making money from each of your transaction, but will also collect massive data which will provide them with the market intelligence to provide even more services. Wechat is probably the most successful to date, largely thanks to barriers which restrict foreign apps.

What Wechat is doing is not new.

As far back as the 80s, Nintendo plotted to use their dominance in the video game console market to offer numerous everyday-life services that is now ubiquitous online; lottery betting, stock trading, banking, ticket booking, etc. All they had to do was pop their telephone line into their Nintendo console. This business was only mildly successful in their home market, and didn't even manage to get off the ground in their US market.

Over the past few year, development in the ex-China online software industry has been interesting.

The beauty of online software is that the ease with which apps are able to transcend physical and political boundaries, allowing it to overcome the entrenched/old players of a market; many of which protected by not only local regulations/traditions, but also their political clout.

After some of the 'niche apps' have entrenched their markets -- such as FB/IG for social media, and Uber/Grab for private transportation -- some of them are growing into other markets. It is tough because they not only have to defend the market of their 'niche,' but also invade new markets. And so there has been lots of burning of cash to grow scale of operations and customer base.

Yet, the free market of online software also means that a lot of these apps that are in use now will eventually be compelled by market forces to leave/merge. Particularly when there is so much cash burn. With no end of cash burn in sight -- since the competition for market share is still on-going -- investor may soon lose their appetite for further funding. The WeWork debacle may signal that we are closer to the end of the cash burn, as PE funds begin to reconsider the appropriate valuations of tech companies.

===

Apps that are able to build holistic profiles of individuals will be those most equipped with providing employment services. Investors who are wondering whether the business of traditional employment agencies will be disrupted, should keep an eye superapps like Wechat. In any case, the headhunting business should be more resilient, compared to brokering low-skilled employment, owing to the lengthy negotiations that is to be expected in the former.

Find Reply
05-10-2019, 11:12 AM.
Post: #24
RE: HRnetGroup
Longer-term, I think there is still a role to play for recruiters. Unlike property agents (which I think is very ripe for disruption) who extract value, recruiters add value in solving frictional unemployment. Logically, the last mile has always been expensive and platforms like LinkedIn doesn't want to that. With AI, job-matching can be easily "gamed" - e.g. matching keywords, desired resume template, how do you evaluate attitude? It's a hassle and will first be a steep learning curve. HR departments want as minimum headache as possible so switching cost can be quite substantial.

For HRnetGroup specifically, they have been in the overseas market for at least a decade but have yet to replicate something as valuable as Recruit Express. I wonder why. Singapore has been stagnant and I do suspect Grab/GoJek/Deliveroo/foodpanda had some impact on the temp staffing scene since they are hiring directly. They are expanding into the Western market, buying up stake in different listed companies. They pitch a turnaround event for Staffline but from an investor's perspective, if Staffline Group has a better proposition, why not just buy Staffline directly? I believe their acquisition cost is still higher than prevailing market price.
=========== Signature ===========
"Criticism is the fertilizer of learning." - Sir John Templeton

Find Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Valuebuddies.com | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication | CONTACT US: nas......@valuebuddies.com | | Share Buy-Back | Disclosure of Interest