Posts: 108 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Oct 2011
	
 Reputation: 
 1
	 
 
	
	
		Cigar Butts: not sure where you got your figures but from 3rd quarter results: 
 
Non-current asset: $496.6m 
Current asset: $247.5m 
Total asset: $744.1m 
 
Current liability: $116m 
Long term liability: $310.9m 
Total liability: $426.9m 
 
Net asset: $317.2m. 
 
No of shares: 268.6m 
 
NAV per share: $1.18 
 
This does not include revaluation gain and future profit. Although Heeton revalue its assets every year (eg Tampines Mart) I think Sun Plaza potential higher value is not included, as well as maybe some gains in its overseas properties in London and Thailand. 
 
Also potential profit from Lumos and Onze and its small stakes in many profitable projects.  
 
All in, maybe $1.50 in RNAV.
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 419 
	Threads: 6 
	Joined: Jan 2013
	
 Reputation: 
 10
	 
 
	
	
		Spouse of Mr Toh Gap Seng / Mr Toh himself purchased 
 
15 january - 40,000 shares for $0.60 each 
13 january - 70,000 shares for $0.60 each 
7 january - 110,000 shares for $0.605 each 
6 january - 100,000 shares for $0.6117 each 
5 january - 90,000 shares for $0.604 each 
 
Still holding.... <vested>
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 108 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Oct 2011
	
 Reputation: 
 1
	 
 
	
	
		Sudden surge. Wonder if its privatisation. NAV $1.26 and even higher if some of its assets are revalued like Sun Plaza and future earnings from many JV and El Centro is considered.
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,746 
	Threads: 23 
	Joined: Mar 2013
	
 Reputation: 
 25
	 
 
	
		
		
		03-10-2016, 09:26 AM 
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2016, 09:35 AM by opmi.)
		
	 
	
		mkt value of property holding company = 95m - 21m = $74m 
sold for $4.
 
OPMI (me not vested) are screwed big time. 
 http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/Announce...eID=423276
2. DETAILS OF THE DISPOSAL 
2.1 Consideration and Payment Terms
 The consideration (“Consideration”) for the Disposal comprised a nominal amount of S$4 for
the purchase of the Sale Shares as well as S$21 million for the transfer of the shareholder’s
loan owing from Heeton Residence to the Company.
The Consideration was arrived at on a willing-buyer, willing-seller basis after taking into
account the adjusted net asset value of Heeton Residence and Heeton Realty as at date of
Completion, and the agreed property value at S$95 million for the Property.
On Completion, the Purchasers paid S$4 for the Sale Shares as well as S$4 million for the 
subscription of junior notes in Heeton Residence which was used to partially discharge the 
Consideration with the balance of S$17 million to be paid on 30 September 2017.  (Still gives 1 year free financing)
As part of the transaction, the Company subscribed for $4 million senior notes in Heeton
Realty due 2019, which bears interest at 5% per annum. (Still provide financing for Buyers)
2.2 Valuation 
The unaudited NTA at the consolidated financial statement level of the Company attributable 
to the Disposal as at 31 August 2016 is approximately S$32 million.
 There is no open market value for the Sale Shares and the shares of Heeton Realty as they
are not publicly traded. (RUBBISH!)
3. RATIONALE 
The residential property market is not recovering due to various factors, including property 
cooling measures, supply of new units to the market and the general macro-economic 
conditions. Given current market conditions, the Consideration offered by the Purchasers for 
Heeton Residence seemed reasonable and offered a viable exit option for the Company.
 
As the Disposal is in line with the Group’s ordinary course of business, Chapter 10 of the 
Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited’s Listing Manual does not apply to the 
Disposal.  (If SGX dont query, the recent talk about corp gov is just hot air)
4. FINANCIAL IMPACT 
The Disposal is expected to have a material negative impact on the earnings and but not 
expected to have a material impact on net tangible assets per share of the Group for the 
current financial year.
	  
	
	
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster
 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 156 
	Threads: 3 
	Joined: Jan 2011
	
 Reputation: 
 8
	 
 
	
		
		
		03-10-2016, 10:50 AM 
(This post was last modified: 03-10-2016, 12:28 PM by Vseeker.)
		
	 
	
		It's Heeton => 100% of Heeton Residences => 100% Heeton Realty 
 
 
iLiv@grange is now valued around $95m 
But as at FYDec2013, Heeton Realty have $88.4m bank loans, I dun know how much bank loans still outstanding today. 
So it's not ($95m - $21m) sold for $4. 
But given the shitty lacking disclosures thus far on this disposal, cannot blame OPMI or anyone else for drawing such a conclusion. 
 
 
Clearly, the NewOwners  are getting a great deal, in that sense, minorities get screwed bigtime !!  ouch !! 
On the other hand, had listed Heeton not make this disposal, 
Year-2 QC penalty (16% or around $12m) for iLiv @grange will kicks in wef this very Oct2016, coz iLiv had already TOPed 3 yrs back in Oct2013. 
 
still, some opmis need to go next year AGM and screw-up the BOD... 
all their 100% controlled projects perform like Sh**, its only their JV projects that's making $$. 
 
 
at $95m and based on buildup floor area of around 60,000 sqft for iLiv, it's sold for only $1583 psf. 
Heeton actually paid over $1700 psfppr for the lands. when they make en bloc acquisition of the site back in 2007. 
 
Beside the cheap price of $1583 psf for a freehold, Grange Road ppty, 
Some more I suspect that by buying over the existing holding company, and not the physical ppty. 
the NewOwners had this Three Advantages 
1) No need to pay 15% ABSD. 
have they have use a company eg. ABC-corp to buy over the physical ppty (iLiv), then another 15% ABSD is payable. 
 
2) Since NewOwners are all Sporeans, QC penalty NO longer apply - so NO more selloff-entire-project deadline for them to meet. 
   (like SimonCheong no longer have any deadline to sell off HillTops & TheMarq) 
 
3) also No SSD penalty to stop new Owners from launching iLiv tomorrow, to sell off some units - if they so wishes 
coz it will just be renamedHeetonRealty launching sales of units in its project iLiv@grange, for the very first time. 
 
Had they use a new ABC-corp to buy over physical ppty (iLiv...), 
then ABC corp will be subjected to a 16%-12%-8%-4% SSD, if it resell any units in iLiv@grange within the next 1-2-3-4 years. 
 
SSD = Seller Stamp Duty 
ABSD = Additional Buyer Stamp Duty
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 106 
	Threads: 1 
	Joined: Dec 2014
	
 Reputation: 
 3
	 
 
	
	
		http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/Announce...eID=446221
Any buddies with a better understanding of China property market able to comment on the potential impact of new special economic zone? Read some pretty crazy stuff about it on Bloomberg about how highways were jammed up with people rushing in physically, and investors sleeping outside property agencies overnight to rush for a purchase.
 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ve-rampage
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 156 
	Threads: 3 
	Joined: Jan 2011
	
 Reputation: 
 8
	 
 
	
	
		 (04-04-2017, 10:55 PM)slowandsteady Wrote:  http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/Announce...eID=446221 
 
Any buddies with a better understanding of China property market able to comment on the potential impact of new special economic zone? Read some pretty crazy stuff about it on Bloomberg about how highways were jammed up with people rushing in physically, and investors sleeping outside property agencies overnight to rush for a purchase. 
 
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ve-rampage 
From below report carried in TheEdge, 
the implied "rumour profitability" for Gaobeidian Phase 1 alone amounts to some s$709m (derived from Oxley's 27.5% is $195m )
 
EXTRACTs from TheEdge Rpt
 "" Caixin, the Beijing-based financial and business news, reported residential prices in places like Baoding shot up from RMB6,000 psm to RMB20,000 psm.
Local property agencies were also forced to close on Monday after the government introduced an emergency sales ban in response to a surge in interest.
The surge in property prices in Hebei and Sino-Singapore Health City is also likely to add significant value to the net asset values of the four JV partners even with the top-tier land appreciation tax of 60%.
According to market watchers, the earnings from the residential portion of Phase 1 alone would add $159 million to KSH’s earnings, and boost NAV by 35 cents per share. And although Oxley would get a $195 million boost, it would add just seven cents to NAV. Lian Beng’s NAV would get a 17 cents lift, and Heeton 16 cents.
On Tuesday, shares of KSH closed 8.5 cents higher at 63.5 cents; shares of Lian Beng closed 7.5 cents higher at 61.5 cents; shares of Heeton closed 2 cents higher at 39.5 cents while shares of Oxley closed 2.5 cents higher at 58.5 cents. ""
Here the link to the full report
 http://www.theedgemarkets.com.sg/article...z-revealed
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,746 
	Threads: 23 
	Joined: Mar 2013
	
 Reputation: 
 25
	 
 
	
		
		
		06-04-2017, 10:13 AM 
(This post was last modified: 06-04-2017, 11:52 AM by opmi.)
		
	 
	
		 (04-04-2017, 10:55 PM)slowandsteady Wrote:  http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/Announce...eID=446221 
 
Any buddies with a better understanding of China property market able to comment on the potential impact of new special economic zone? Read some pretty crazy stuff about it on Bloomberg about how highways were jammed up with people rushing in physically, and investors sleeping outside property agencies overnight to rush for a purchase. 
 
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/...ve-rampage 
Not an expert on PRC property. Just an observer only....some thoughts. Read at own risk.
 
SZ took about 20-30 years to develop to the current state. 
 
Even a sub-zone in SZ like Qianhai is still developing. Went to look see QH in 2012. Empty piece of land with closed 2 MRT stations. Went there last year, can see a few skyscrapers completing soon. 
But MRT stations still closed. 
 
Another development zone Nansha near GZ..supposedly the new economic centre of Pearl River Delta. went there in 2008+. Heard from friend, still the same...nothing much happened.
 
So the new XA NEZ will take some time. 
 
the PRC masses are crazy lemmings.....as shown in many cases...
	  
	
	
"... but quitting while you're ahead is not the same as quitting." - Quote from the movie American Gangster
 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 3,775 
	Threads: 6 
	Joined: Oct 2012
	
 Reputation: 
 95
	 
 
	
	
		^^^ Agree... theme vs timeline 
 
The internet theme in 2000 was correct... we are seeing the fruits and results of e-commerce and connectivity. Problem was that Mr Market thought it could be delivered within 3-5 years
	 
	
	
Before you speak, listen. Before you write, think. Before you spend, earn. Before you invest, investigate. Before you criticize, wait. Before you pray, forgive. Before you quit, try. Before you retire, save. Before you die, give. –William A. Ward 
 
Think Asset-Business-Structure (ABS)
 
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 204 
	Threads: 1 
	Joined: Jun 2015
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Heeton was mentioned on the edge.  Can infer that they would make 17.4c from High Park Residences if the assumption for chip eng seng is correct.  for Gaobeidian, analysts had earlier estimated that they could make 16 to possibly 38c for that project?
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	 
 |