30-11-2014, 12:04 AM
(28-11-2014, 09:29 AM)newbie11 Wrote: [ -> ](28-11-2014, 12:44 AM)BlueKelah Wrote: [ -> ]"The committee report, tabled by chairwoman Kelly O’Dwyer, shows these fines would also be applied to real estate agents, accountants, lawyers and conveyancers that knowingly assist in illegal purchases, exposing them to hefty penalties in the event of getting caught. And any capital gains from properties that are found to be illegally bought and undergo a compulsory sale would be retained by the government, under the recommendations."Don't understand what you meant. Local parties are engaged by foreign purchasers. Firb approval is always a condition prior to settlement of contract. Don't see an impact or whatsoever. . Though there always will be the very minority that try to game or fraud the system but these people are surely not just foreigners
Looks like this will be the trigger for aus prop to start going down. Don't think any foreign buyer home purchases can be done, now that local professionals will be involved as well, they would require all overseas buyers to get FIRB approval first. And FIRB with an influx of applications will take a long time to approve.
aussie gov is all talk most of the time, until they run out of money then they will start policies to "extract" money from the system. Capital gains retained by government should be helpful with the billion dollar hole in the budget which the treasurer is now trying to plug.
Now let's see what treasurer Joe Hockey will do.
Analysts split over effect on developers
Samantha Hutchinson
483 words
29 Nov 2014
The Australian Financial Review
AFNR
English
Copyright 2014. Fairfax Media Management Pty Limited.
Analysts are divided on the impact that changes proposed by a federal government report into offshore property purchases will have on Australia's biggest residential developers.
Minister Kelly O'Dwyer and a House of Representatives Economics Standing Committee have proposed to strengthen the administration of laws governing overseas buyers in Australian real estate.
More emphasis on oversight will boost compliance in the sector, Ms O'Dwyer argued, after years of haphazard administration and no enforcement orders since 2006.
But some analysts argue that non-compliance within the current framework is likely to be low, and for this reason, any impact the report has on the country's biggest residential developers will only be limited.
"We do not expect [these changes] to have a significant impact on residential markets or the residential developers, Stockland Property Group or Mirvac," Citi analyst Philip Cheetham said.
"Capital preservation is a big driving factor and we think that's likely to have encouraged compliance over the past years," he added.
"I'm a big believer that people act in their personal interest . . . if you've spent your life accumulating capital, the last thing you want to do is to potentially lose it by not obeying the rules and laws."
Other analysts argue non-compliance is likely to be high, and the report's impact on apartment developers will be more pronounced with more buyers forced into buying new property.
"There's been no enforcement, and we think there's been a fair bit of overspill in that people are buying existing homes when they really should only be buying new homes," one analyst said, who preferred to go unnamed.
"If anything, I think these new rules could funnel buyers into new property because they've got no option to buy older homes, and that could be a great thing for a group like Mirvac or Lend Lease."
Mr Cheetham believes that if non-compliances is a serious problem, better enforcement of the rules may lead to weakness in house prices, due to the fact an existing buyer group is no longer an active participant, he reasoned.
"This in turn could impact the new dwellings segment of the market by way of a reference point in pricing," he said, adding: "We think the risk of this is low."
Mr Cheetham noted the paucity of data surrounding the buying trends of offshore buyers, and the difficulty in calculating the impact of proposals, but argued that risks were weighted toward the established housing market.
"If non-compliant investment IS material, we think it's more likely to be in the established housing market than new dwellings (given the lack of restrictions on new dwellings) hence . . . we see the risk as being predominantly in the established housing market" he added.
Key points Changes to legal administration proposed. Emphasis on oversight to boost compliance.
Fairfax Media Management Pty Limited
Document AFNR000020141128eabt0000q