(05-08-2021, 10:29 PM)smallcaps Wrote: Interesting point from 1H21 results:
https://links.sgx.com/1.0.0/corporate-an..._final.pdf
...
The numerous milestones achieved by Yangzijiang was due to a combination of favourable market conditions and the Group’s continuous efforts to ensure sustainable growth and build competitive advantages in its core shipbuilding business. In view of the Board’s commitment to continuously improve corporate governance and focus on developing its strengths in shipbuilding, the Group is in the preliminarily phase of conducting a strategic review of its debt investment portfolio to allow the Group to focus solely on the expansion of its core shipbuilding business. As Yangzijiang aspires to become one of the best shipbuilders in the world, we remain committed to ensuring long-term value creation for all stakeholders and will act in the best interest of our shareholders.
..
Based on the 1H results, I interpret them to show that:
1. Nearly half of the net assets were held in debt instruments, after allowing for provisions
2. More than half of the 1H net income came from the yield on those debt instruments.
So, was it what it says in the title, a shipbuilding business, or a finance company with a shipbuilding subsidiary?
The latest announcement from last Friday shows that the amortized cost of debt instruments, excluding provisions, has reduced from 18.5 bn RMB on 30th June 2021 to 12.5 bn RMB, with 26% of that related to the real estate business, but none to Evergrande.
https://links.sgx.com/FileOpen/Clarifica...eID=684521
There was about 1.835 bn RMB in provisions on these debt instruments in the 1H 2021 accounts, down from 2bn in 1H 2020.
While it is good that management had already recognised the need to get back to concentrating on shipbuilding, this side of their business is still significant and I wonder if they are going to have to take some further big provisions in the current environment, particularly on the real estate related debt instruments.