although the two companies have different operations(Boustead has energy related engineering/real estate solutions/water engineering/geo-spatial, CSE has heathcare/oil&gas/mining/infrastructure) , they do exhibit some similarities in term of certain investment merits, I believe.
similarities:
1. both are global diversified engineering company
2. both are project based company with lumpy earning and depending on order book
3. both have 500+ million shares outstanding and are illiquid counters.
4. for FY ended in 31/03/2011 Boustead earned NP('000) 52,235. for FY ended in 31/12/2010, CSE Global earned NP('000) 52,477
5. both had net cash generated from operation of 50+ million and low capex (removing one-off acquisition), thus strong FCF.
6. Boustead got setback from Libya while CSE Global had project cost over-run from its telecom project in middle east
7. both has high adjusted ROE (Boustead removing its cash while CSE Global removing its intangibles)
8. both has current ratio of around 2.
differences
1. balance sheet, Boustead is stronger, having 200+ million cash and around 25 million loan (but quite a lot of other liabilities), while CSE Global has less than 60 million cash and less than 60 million loan. net net Boustead still has a much higher tangible equity.
2. order book, CSE Global has a stronger order book of around 400 as end of 31/12/2010, Boustead has less than 300 mil as end of 31/03/2011
3. profit margin, CSE Global was higher than Boustead.
4. ...
As of market close @21/10/2011, Boustead closed at 0.81, CSE Global closed at 0.76, 5 cents difference. with gloomy economy outlook, will the difference be wider in the future?
similarities:
1. both are global diversified engineering company
2. both are project based company with lumpy earning and depending on order book
3. both have 500+ million shares outstanding and are illiquid counters.
4. for FY ended in 31/03/2011 Boustead earned NP('000) 52,235. for FY ended in 31/12/2010, CSE Global earned NP('000) 52,477
5. both had net cash generated from operation of 50+ million and low capex (removing one-off acquisition), thus strong FCF.
6. Boustead got setback from Libya while CSE Global had project cost over-run from its telecom project in middle east
7. both has high adjusted ROE (Boustead removing its cash while CSE Global removing its intangibles)
8. both has current ratio of around 2.
differences
1. balance sheet, Boustead is stronger, having 200+ million cash and around 25 million loan (but quite a lot of other liabilities), while CSE Global has less than 60 million cash and less than 60 million loan. net net Boustead still has a much higher tangible equity.
2. order book, CSE Global has a stronger order book of around 400 as end of 31/12/2010, Boustead has less than 300 mil as end of 31/03/2011
3. profit margin, CSE Global was higher than Boustead.
4. ...
As of market close @21/10/2011, Boustead closed at 0.81, CSE Global closed at 0.76, 5 cents difference. with gloomy economy outlook, will the difference be wider in the future?