Hyflux

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
they are already prepared for such a case, it will take many many years for the trials to conclude anyway... :O
1) Try NOT to LOSE money!
2) Do NOT SELL in BEAR, BUY-BUY-BUY! invest in managements/companies that does the same!
3) CASH in hand is KING in BEAR! 
4) In BULL, SELL-SELL-SELL! 
Reply
(17-11-2022, 12:30 PM)Behappyalways Wrote: Hyflux's former CEO, CFO and independent directors charged with offences under SFA and CA
https://www.theedgesingapore.com/news/co...sfa-and-ca

Not a law expert but it seems this white collar violation does carry a jail sentence. This ex ID pleaded guilty and hence may have escaped prison time.

Olivia Lum and the rest are going to trial and so we will have to see how things transpire.

Hyflux’s ex-director Mitta fined S$90,000, barred from directorships; Olivia Lum’s trial starts Aug 11

However, it failed to disclose that Tuaspring was Hyflux’s expansion into a new business of selling electricity, which was outside its core competency area of desalination. It also did not mention that the revenue from the sale of electricity from Tuaspring’s power plant was projected to make up the significant majority of Tuaspring’s turnover. Neither was it disclosed that the profitability of Tuaspring was to be contingent on revenue from the sale of electricity from the power plant, and this had implications for Tuaspring’s resulting exposure to market risks arising from the volatility of electricity prices.

To the prosecution’s seeking general deterrence in the sentencing, the district court handed down that S$90,000 fine and the mandatory five-year disqualification order.

Mitta could have been fined up to S$250,000, jailed for up to seven years, or both.

https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/compani...rts-aug-11
I am not a certified financial advisor and so nothing of what I say should be construed as financial advice. Please consult a certified financial advisor for advice instead.
Reply
I reserve my in depth comment until after the completion.

But a $90,000 fine which equates to possibly five years pay as ID for neligigence is underwhelming; the carrot and stick i feel is skewed, when the outcome is that the public losts a few tens of millions in dollars. Alternatively if prosecution is worried costs public funds, just fine an equivalent amount to the time in jail, these are white collar workers, money is less of an issue to them; time is
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 26 Guest(s)