PE ratios are misleading for cyclical businesses?It's a bad idea to buy at low PE

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#1
Shocked 
PE ratios are misleading for cyclical businesses?It's a bad idea to buy at low PE

P/E ratio can be misleading a lot of times, especially when the underlying business is cyclical and unpredictable. Cyclical businesses have higher profit margins at the peaks of the business cycles. Their earnings are high and P/E ratios are artificially low. It is usually a bad idea to buy a cyclical business when the P/E is low.


Got this statement from GF's website. Anyone can shed some light on this statement?
Reply
#2
(16-11-2014, 09:58 AM)wahkao Wrote: PE ratios are misleading for cyclical businesses?It's a bad idea to buy at low PE

P/E ratio can be misleading a lot of times, especially when the underlying business is cyclical and unpredictable. Cyclical businesses have higher profit margins at the peaks of the business cycles. Their earnings are high and P/E ratios are artificially low. It is usually a bad idea to buy a cyclical business when the P/E is low.


Got this statement from GF's website. Anyone can shed some light on this statement?

If I am not wrong, the concept originated from peterlynch' "one up on Wall Street" book.

It is true. If u are buying CPO plantation company as a recovery play, u will see as another forummer has said, it's PE is 300 if u annualized latest quarter of results.

The problem is, we never know how long a peak or a trough will lasts, or if it is going to breaker higher high before bubble pricks.

That is where qualitative anaylsis come in and you decide looking forward to the next 3 years at least what is the reasonable earnings. (Concept by fisher)
life goes in cycles, predictable yet uncontrollable; just like the markets, but markets give you a second chance
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)