Thread Closed 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Best World
9 hours ago,
Post: #741
RE: Best World
(11 hours ago)Nikki Wrote:
(Yesterday, 09:44 AM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 12:40 PM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:55 AM)level13 Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:23 AM)Boon Wrote: Bring out value related issues that you want to discuss, am I stopping someone to discuss the real issues ?

You are not stopping anyone. But to disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility which most of us have good impression of. 

Most of us has got the point you are trying to bring out. As weijian said, there are no prizes in winning an online arguement.

So what harm have I done besides harming my credibility?

As I have told Weijian it was intentional, as I think it is the best way to untangle arguments based on rational fallacies - the intention of doing it slow and in parts, IMO, enhance understanding of the issues.

In investing, if my win has to be your loss or your win has to be my loss, to me that’s no fun.
 
a)   To lose an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
b)  To win an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
c)   To win an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s fun.
d)  To lose an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s still fun.
 
At VB, if you agreed with my point of views do not neccessily mean we are both right with respect to the real investment world, as we could be both wrong.
 
Given a choice, I would rather be wrong in VB and be right in the real investment world.

The purpose is to learn in/from VB and WIN in the real investment world.

True, there is no price for winning an online argument, but the learning values from i is tremendous.

This is not about right or wrong.
This is not about battle of pride.
This is not about winning an online argument.
This is about challenging one’s critical thinking.
This is about learning………
 
“To disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility”
 
1) Is this statement considered a logical fallacy?
2) Is this considered to be “out of topic” ?

Seriously Boon, did you ever see yourself snapping out of this loop, if so under what condition(s)?

Moderator, how much leeway and bandwidth are you going to give him.  I been lurking in this thread once in a while but more the past few days due to BW price swings.  And I need to filter out all these noises in a page just to see if there is something new.  It would be easier and healthier if you delete all of these unnecessary postings and if he persists the ban him temporary give him time to get a grip on himself and let this thread return to normalcy.

Is there a need for you to add oil into fire? You have been lurking around but not contributing much, and just because you see something not useful to you, you get frustrated and suggest moderator to act on it. I shall not comment on Boon's recent posts, but he has indeed contributed greatly and provided useful information to all buddies, how about you? Have you ever thank him before?

Sorry moderator for contributing out-of-topics comments.

Find
9 hours ago,
Post: #742
RE: Best World
(9 hours ago)Ben Wrote:
(11 hours ago)Nikki Wrote:
(Yesterday, 09:44 AM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 12:40 PM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:55 AM)level13 Wrote: You are not stopping anyone. But to disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility which most of us have good impression of. 

Most of us has got the point you are trying to bring out. As weijian said, there are no prizes in winning an online arguement.

So what harm have I done besides harming my credibility?

As I have told Weijian it was intentional, as I think it is the best way to untangle arguments based on rational fallacies - the intention of doing it slow and in parts, IMO, enhance understanding of the issues.

In investing, if my win has to be your loss or your win has to be my loss, to me that’s no fun.
 
a)   To lose an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
b)  To win an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
c)   To win an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s fun.
d)  To lose an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s still fun.
 
At VB, if you agreed with my point of views do not neccessily mean we are both right with respect to the real investment world, as we could be both wrong.
 
Given a choice, I would rather be wrong in VB and be right in the real investment world.

The purpose is to learn in/from VB and WIN in the real investment world.

True, there is no price for winning an online argument, but the learning values from i is tremendous.

This is not about right or wrong.
This is not about battle of pride.
This is not about winning an online argument.
This is about challenging one’s critical thinking.
This is about learning………
 
“To disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility”
 
1) Is this statement considered a logical fallacy?
2) Is this considered to be “out of topic” ?

Seriously Boon, did you ever see yourself snapping out of this loop, if so under what condition(s)?

Moderator, how much leeway and bandwidth are you going to give him.  I been lurking in this thread once in a while but more the past few days due to BW price swings.  And I need to filter out all these noises in a page just to see if there is something new.  It would be easier and healthier if you delete all of these unnecessary postings and if he persists the ban him temporary give him time to get a grip on himself and let this thread return to normalcy.

Is there a need for you to add oil into fire? You have been lurking around but not contributing much, and just because you see something not useful to you, you get frustrated and suggest moderator to act on it. I shall not comment on Boon's recent posts, but he has indeed contributed greatly and provided useful information to all buddies, how about you? Have you ever thank him before?

Sorry moderator for contributing out-of-topics comments.

Good afternoon everyone.

I Second That.
Not a call to Buy or Sell

Mr Bump: All I Can Smell Is My FEAR

Find
9 hours ago,
Post: #743
RE: Best World
(11 hours ago)Nikki Wrote:
(Yesterday, 09:44 AM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 12:40 PM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:55 AM)level13 Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:23 AM)Boon Wrote: Bring out value related issues that you want to discuss, am I stopping someone to discuss the real issues ?

You are not stopping anyone. But to disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility which most of us have good impression of. 

Most of us has got the point you are trying to bring out. As weijian said, there are no prizes in winning an online arguement.

So what harm have I done besides harming my credibility?

As I have told Weijian it was intentional, as I think it is the best way to untangle arguments based on rational fallacies - the intention of doing it slow and in parts, IMO, enhance understanding of the issues.

In investing, if my win has to be your loss or your win has to be my loss, to me that’s no fun.
 
a)   To lose an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
b)  To win an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
c)   To win an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s fun.
d)  To lose an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s still fun.
 
At VB, if you agreed with my point of views do not neccessily mean we are both right with respect to the real investment world, as we could be both wrong.
 
Given a choice, I would rather be wrong in VB and be right in the real investment world.

The purpose is to learn in/from VB and WIN in the real investment world.

True, there is no price for winning an online argument, but the learning values from i is tremendous.

This is not about right or wrong.
This is not about battle of pride.
This is not about winning an online argument.
This is about challenging one’s critical thinking.
This is about learning………
 
“To disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility”
 
1) Is this statement considered a logical fallacy?
2) Is this considered to be “out of topic” ?

Seriously Boon, did you ever see yourself snapping out of this loop, if so under what condition(s)?

Moderator, how much leeway and bandwidth are you going to give him.  I been lurking in this thread once in a while but more the past few days due to BW price swings.  And I need to filter out all these noises in a page just to see if there is something new.  It would be easier and healthier if you delete all of these unnecessary postings and if he persists the ban him temporary give him time to get a grip on himself and let this thread return to normalcy.

Hi Nikki,

Welcome to VB and thank you for being so direct - Had you pushed the REPORT button, I would then not be able to tell who is complaining about me and what they are unhappy about me. Now I know.

Have there been something new in this thread in the past few days?

I think there are,

Have I been contributing to it - I think I have.

Have you been contributing to it?

Can you contribute to something new?

You need to filter out all these noises in a page just to see if there is something new - do you expect VB to do it for you?

As I have said in post # 610:

It is still a long way to go if I were to embark further on this “meaningful” voyage by going through the following videos and analyze them from the various perspectives as listed ……………………….. more “inconsistencies” would be uncovered for sure………………… What could be more “meaningful” than doing these?
 
Videos
1)  BWL Convention 2017 Dora Speech 01
2)  BWL Convention 2017 Dora Speech 02
3)  SDA Speech (BWL Convention 2017)
4)  BWL’s first Star Diamond Ambassador
5)  Top 10 Earners (BWL Convention 2017)
6)  BWL Convention 2016 Dora Speech 01
7)  etc
 
 Perspectives:
a)   Legal
b)  Regulatory
c)   Business model
d)  Business structure
e)   Compensation structure
f)    Distributor agreement
g)   Ranking advancement
h)  Top Earners
i)    etc
 
There are still lots of "new" thing to come, should I chose to do so.........
Millionfaith has tried to stop me.
Are you trying to do the same?

I am not above the VB rules. 
My posts which have violated the rules should be deleted.
Would you be happy if I ban myself from posting on this thread for 5 days?
Research, research and research - Please do your own due diligence (DYODD) before you invest - Any reliance on my analysis is SOLELY at your own risk.

Find
9 hours ago,
Post: #744
RE: Best World
(11 hours ago)Nikki Wrote:
(Yesterday, 09:44 AM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 12:40 PM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:55 AM)level13 Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:23 AM)Boon Wrote: Bring out value related issues that you want to discuss, am I stopping someone to discuss the real issues ?

You are not stopping anyone. But to disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility which most of us have good impression of. 

Most of us has got the point you are trying to bring out. As weijian said, there are no prizes in winning an online arguement.

So what harm have I done besides harming my credibility?

As I have told Weijian it was intentional, as I think it is the best way to untangle arguments based on rational fallacies - the intention of doing it slow and in parts, IMO, enhance understanding of the issues.

In investing, if my win has to be your loss or your win has to be my loss, to me that’s no fun.
 
a)   To lose an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
b)  To win an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
c)   To win an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s fun.
d)  To lose an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s still fun.
 
At VB, if you agreed with my point of views do not neccessily mean we are both right with respect to the real investment world, as we could be both wrong.
 
Given a choice, I would rather be wrong in VB and be right in the real investment world.

The purpose is to learn in/from VB and WIN in the real investment world.

True, there is no price for winning an online argument, but the learning values from i is tremendous.

This is not about right or wrong.
This is not about battle of pride.
This is not about winning an online argument.
This is about challenging one’s critical thinking.
This is about learning………
 
“To disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility”
 
1) Is this statement considered a logical fallacy?
2) Is this considered to be “out of topic” ?

Seriously Boon, did you ever see yourself snapping out of this loop, if so under what condition(s)?

Moderator, how much leeway and bandwidth are you going to give him.  I been lurking in this thread once in a while but more the past few days due to BW price swings.  And I need to filter out all these noises in a page just to see if there is something new.  It would be easier and healthier if you delete all of these unnecessary postings and if he persists the ban him temporary give him time to get a grip on himself and let this thread return to normalcy.

I would appreciate that you start contributing instead of taking on a fellow contributor who has been actively participating here since 2012.

Just my Diary
corylogics.blogspot.com/



Find
8 hours ago,
Post: #745
RE: Best World
(9 hours ago)corydorus Wrote:
(11 hours ago)Nikki Wrote:
(Yesterday, 09:44 AM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 12:40 PM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:55 AM)level13 Wrote: You are not stopping anyone. But to disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility which most of us have good impression of. 

Most of us has got the point you are trying to bring out. As weijian said, there are no prizes in winning an online arguement.

So what harm have I done besides harming my credibility?

As I have told Weijian it was intentional, as I think it is the best way to untangle arguments based on rational fallacies - the intention of doing it slow and in parts, IMO, enhance understanding of the issues.

In investing, if my win has to be your loss or your win has to be my loss, to me that’s no fun.
 
a)   To lose an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
b)  To win an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
c)   To win an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s fun.
d)  To lose an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s still fun.
 
At VB, if you agreed with my point of views do not neccessily mean we are both right with respect to the real investment world, as we could be both wrong.
 
Given a choice, I would rather be wrong in VB and be right in the real investment world.

The purpose is to learn in/from VB and WIN in the real investment world.

True, there is no price for winning an online argument, but the learning values from i is tremendous.

This is not about right or wrong.
This is not about battle of pride.
This is not about winning an online argument.
This is about challenging one’s critical thinking.
This is about learning………
 
“To disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility”
 
1) Is this statement considered a logical fallacy?
2) Is this considered to be “out of topic” ?

Seriously Boon, did you ever see yourself snapping out of this loop, if so under what condition(s)?

Moderator, how much leeway and bandwidth are you going to give him.  I been lurking in this thread once in a while but more the past few days due to BW price swings.  And I need to filter out all these noises in a page just to see if there is something new.  It would be easier and healthier if you delete all of these unnecessary postings and if he persists the ban him temporary give him time to get a grip on himself and let this thread return to normalcy.

I would appreciate that you start contributing instead of taking on a fellow contributor who has been actively participating here since 2012.

I second that, Cory.  Cool

Find
8 hours ago,
Post: #746
RE: Best World
(11 hours ago)Nikki Wrote: Seriously Boon, did you ever see yourself snapping out of this loop, if so under what condition(s)?

Moderator, how much leeway and bandwidth are you going to give him.  I been lurking in this thread once in a while but more the past few days due to BW price swings.  And I need to filter out all these noises in a page just to see if there is something new.  It would be easier and healthier if you delete all of these unnecessary postings and if he persists the ban him temporary give him time to get a grip on himself and let this thread return to normalcy.

Nikki, Nikki, Nikki, 

Who are you to tell off Boon? 

You have registered for more than 6 months. The only 2 posts you have are in the BW thread (yesterday and today). You admit that you only lurk in this thread. And you have ZERO contribution. You are telling off a regular and highly-respected contributor who does it for essentially free. 

And you suddenly have the moral authority to question him when he will snap out of it? 

Since you made it so personal, so shall I. Have you lost money on BW? If you need to filter the noise in this page, then it's the homework one needs to do to be an investor of BW. 

To add some relevance to this post, since we are talking about BW in China (and guess what, they use social media esp 微信 in China), go check out what they had to say in their 微信 channel and share your findings in this thread instead of being a whiner. 

And Moderator - I think you did a bad job. It's easy for me to say that. And, yes, I said that. Ban me if you want.

Find
8 hours ago,
Post: #747
RE: Best World
(9 hours ago)Ben Wrote:
(11 hours ago)Nikki Wrote: Seriously Boon, did you ever see yourself snapping out of this loop, if so under what condition(s)?

Moderator, how much leeway and bandwidth are you going to give him.  I been lurking in this thread once in a while but more the past few days due to BW price swings.  And I need to filter out all these noises in a page just to see if there is something new.  It would be easier and healthier if you delete all of these unnecessary postings and if he persists the ban him temporary give him time to get a grip on himself and let this thread return to normalcy.

Is there a need for you to add oil into fire? You have been lurking around but not contributing much, and just because you see something not useful to you, you get frustrated and suggest moderator to act on it. I shall not comment on Boon's recent posts, but he has indeed contributed greatly and provided useful information to all buddies, how about you? Have you ever thank him before?

Sorry moderator for contributing out-of-topics comments.

I may have only read a few of Boon's postings in this entire thread and am interested in what others posted. I have no interest or to know what his beef is with other poster and I have no need to. However I do apologise to all in this thread that, I should have refrain from commenting without the mandatory contribution to it first. I trade both ways, meaning I don't just buy and then sell but sell and then buy to cover. But of course we all have our definition of what an open forum is, and I respect that.

As an old timer is forums participation, I have seen this happen time again, when people bring their issues into the thread. This thread is about BW and not about personal issues. This thread is bigger than all of us put together.

Find
7 hours ago,
Post: #748
RE: Best World
(11 hours ago)Nikki Wrote:
(Yesterday, 09:44 AM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 12:40 PM)Boon Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:55 AM)level13 Wrote:
(17-08-2017, 09:23 AM)Boon Wrote: Bring out value related issues that you want to discuss, am I stopping someone to discuss the real issues ?

You are not stopping anyone. But to disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility which most of us have good impression of. 

Most of us has got the point you are trying to bring out. As weijian said, there are no prizes in winning an online arguement.

So what harm have I done besides harming my credibility?

As I have told Weijian it was intentional, as I think it is the best way to untangle arguments based on rational fallacies - the intention of doing it slow and in parts, IMO, enhance understanding of the issues.

In investing, if my win has to be your loss or your win has to be my loss, to me that’s no fun.
 
a)   To lose an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
b)  To win an online argument on VB and lose a battle in the real investment world, that’s no fun.
c)   To win an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s fun.
d)  To lose an online argument on VB and win a battle in the real investment world, that’s still fun.
 
At VB, if you agreed with my point of views do not neccessily mean we are both right with respect to the real investment world, as we could be both wrong.
 
Given a choice, I would rather be wrong in VB and be right in the real investment world.

The purpose is to learn in/from VB and WIN in the real investment world.

True, there is no price for winning an online argument, but the learning values from i is tremendous.

This is not about right or wrong.
This is not about battle of pride.
This is not about winning an online argument.
This is about challenging one’s critical thinking.
This is about learning………
 
“To disect millionfaith posting word by word and then doing a >10 posts rebutal is not helping in your credibility”
 
1) Is this statement considered a logical fallacy?
2) Is this considered to be “out of topic” ?

Seriously Boon, did you ever see yourself snapping out of this loop, if so under what condition(s)?

Moderator, how much leeway and bandwidth are you going to give him.  I been lurking in this thread once in a while but more the past few days due to BW price swings.  And I need to filter out all these noises in a page just to see if there is something new.  It would be easier and healthier if you delete all of these unnecessary postings and if he persists the ban him temporary give him time to get a grip on himself and let this thread return to normalcy.

Nikki , What have you contributed beside asking Moderator to delete and ban Boon ?  Why are you so afraid Boon may show us more facts ?

Find
7 hours ago,
Post: #749
RE: Best World
Due to recent postings here, the thread will be temporarily closed pending review of the moderators.

A reminder that out of topic discussion is not advised.

Find
7 hours ago,
Post: #750
RE: Best World
Thread is now temporarily closed.

Find
Thread Closed 


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
Valuebuddies.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication | CONTACT US: nas......@valuebuddies.com |