20-10-2014, 04:02 PM
(20-10-2014, 03:21 PM)DP28 Wrote:Economy has never been free of politics since day one of civilisation.(20-10-2014, 03:14 PM)Temperament Wrote: Why in most countries, it's usually the students to maybe some young working adults will agitate (if necessary) for some changes in the government? What actually the HK's youngs want? So if they can vote freely for G then what? Can they then really influence the G's policies?
For Singapore, "Tan Wah Piow" was a student leader trying to influence some changes. So was the period of Barisan's time. With students against the police in the "Hock Lee" bus incidents.
Now we have only RN & H3.
It's great to be young isn't it?
It really depends on whose behind the scene. When you are 17 years old, what did you know about politics? Are all economy free of politics these days? Just my two cents worth.. Hence, Its great to be young but not in an ignorant way. Think about the big picture.
I think I read somewhere in this forum ..Didnt Li Ka sheng sold down most of his asset earlier this year?? why?
WB:-
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.
1) Rule # 1, do not lose money.
2) Rule # 2, refer to # 1.
3) Not until you can manage your emotions, you can manage your money.
Truism of Investments.
A) Buying a security is buying RISK not Return
B) You can control RISK (to a certain level, hopefully only.) But definitely not the outcome of the Return.
NB:-
My signature is meant for psychoing myself. No offence to anyone. i am trying not to lose money unnecessary anymore.