I would not agree with that except on very short time scales. Over 1 year, the stock increased by over 50%, over 2 year by over 100%. It went up in steps, so yes, this may have often appeared to be not moving over a few months.
I find that article in #1 (including the comments) really well researched, a catalyst in the author's view may be the resumption of sales of Macau properties, perhaps in 2015. If the share price proceeds on the path of the last 2 years, it will not be hard to keep for another year or two.
I find that article in #1 (including the comments) really well researched, a catalyst in the author's view may be the resumption of sales of Macau properties, perhaps in 2015. If the share price proceeds on the path of the last 2 years, it will not be hard to keep for another year or two.