Homepage
PR Newswire
04-08-2014, 11:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-08-2014, 08:37 AM by Curiousparty.)
How can the City Council be so sure that the 4min is not due to some "margin of error" due to computer simulation?
4 min/ 180 min x 100% = 2.22%.
(faint)
***********
In relation to the State Library forecourt the Clause outlines the following:
"Development should not cast any additional shadows across St Paul’s
Square, the Plaza and the Atrium which are part of Federation Square, any part of City Square, Queensbridge Square or the State Library forecourt, between 11.00 am and 2.00 pm on 22 June".
A shadow analysis undertaken by City of Melbourne using the 3D computing model indicates that the proposed tower will result in shadowing of the forecourt from 1.56pm on 22 June.
Whilst it might be argued that this is technically only four minutes into the period referred to in the policy , the extent of shadow extends across the full width of the space and gets steadily worse, as demonstrated in the shadow diagrams below.
4 min/ 180 min x 100% = 2.22%.
(faint)
***********
In relation to the State Library forecourt the Clause outlines the following:
"Development should not cast any additional shadows across St Paul’s
Square, the Plaza and the Atrium which are part of Federation Square, any part of City Square, Queensbridge Square or the State Library forecourt, between 11.00 am and 2.00 pm on 22 June".
A shadow analysis undertaken by City of Melbourne using the 3D computing model indicates that the proposed tower will result in shadowing of the forecourt from 1.56pm on 22 June.
Whilst it might be argued that this is technically only four minutes into the period referred to in the policy , the extent of shadow extends across the full width of the space and gets steadily worse, as demonstrated in the shadow diagrams below.
(04-08-2014, 09:57 PM)RT Knight Wrote: To all who has doubt. THis is the recent CEL project at CUB site, which is at the 170Victoria Street. Not the Tower Melbourne. Tower Melbourne more or less, should resume the demolition soon, since the court has give the positive statement to CEL, which CEL has mentioned in the company announcement.
http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/AboutCou...arlton.pdf
[I am not here to promote any stocks. Please always do your own research before embarking on any investment decision. I will not be liable for any of your own decisions. Your use of any information or materials is entirely at your own risk. It is your responsibility to ensure that any products, services or information meet your specific requirements. I do not produce material which meets the objectives of any specific financial and risk profile of investors.]