Catherine Lim - A Follow-up on the letter to PM Lee

[Lancelot]

This article carries a lot of half truths as usual.

This statement is an example of that :

"Mr Ngerng complied with all the demands – but Mr Lee dismissed them and on 30 May commenced legal action."

Anyone who has seriously followed the events..and has read the chronology in VB specific by spec and others will know that sentence is just totally untrue.

This is the latest sequence updated by egghead:

1) Roy Accusing PM of stealing.
1.1 PM threatened to sue
1.2 Roy admit cannot substantiate what he said
1a Roy took down post and apologized. Asked for more time to offer damage and was granted
1b Instead posted summary of what he posted before and made a video (?)
Received further demand to remove postings and video or face aggravated damage. Pretend to comply but instead circulated postings and videos to international media.

1c Offered $5k compensation
2) PM suing of Roy

Forumers with better memory of the sequence of events or important details can update us on the chronology of facts. Without establishing the chronology it is all a lot of gibberish about what has happened and accusations with no understanding.

Hi specuvestor,

If Catherine Lim made untrue statement , PM Lee should sue her to clear his name. Let's see whether PM Lee has ground to sue her .