Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner
15-07-2012, 05:53 PM
Based on historical data since 1975, Private Residential Property indeed offered better risk-adjusted returns compared to equities. However, we need to be mindful that Singapore has developed from a third world country then to a global city now. So, where do we move from here…? Real estate is a leveraged investment, better to be prudent.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner - by Musicwhiz - 15-07-2012, 08:29 AM
RE: Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner - by Contrarian - 15-07-2012, 11:26 AM
RE: Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner - by Musicwhiz - 15-07-2012, 11:31 AM
RE: Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner - by Muck - 15-07-2012, 03:12 PM
RE: Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner - by CityFarmer - 15-07-2012, 04:35 PM
RE: Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner - by bookworm - 15-07-2012, 05:53 PM
RE: Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner - by sportsinvestment - 15-07-2012, 07:51 PM
RE: Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner - by CityFarmer - 16-07-2012, 11:15 AM
RE: Property v stocks: No clear-cut winner - by money - 20-07-2012, 05:34 PM
|
Homepage
PR Newswire
