29-06-2015, 07:58 AM
Hi portuser
TTA owns 9% does not mean losses will be 9% to TTA
Hi Oldman9
It is obvious to me why cb1 restructured maturity to one month before cb2. If cb1 holders were confident they would have restructured to after cb2 maturity
Now that the payment has been delayed to cb2 maturity, it can be construed either way. The saga and debate continues for another month; and none will be wiser next 4 weeks
TTA owns 9% does not mean losses will be 9% to TTA
Hi Oldman9
It is obvious to me why cb1 restructured maturity to one month before cb2. If cb1 holders were confident they would have restructured to after cb2 maturity
Now that the payment has been delayed to cb2 maturity, it can be construed either way. The saga and debate continues for another month; and none will be wiser next 4 weeks
Before you speak, listen. Before you write, think. Before you spend, earn. Before you invest, investigate. Before you criticize, wait. Before you pray, forgive. Before you quit, try. Before you retire, save. Before you die, give. –William A. Ward
Think Asset-Business-Structure (ABS)
Think Asset-Business-Structure (ABS)