Posts: 110
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation:
4
The fact that the company is holding its 'fire' means it is serious about giving out a bumper bazooka through capital reduction.
For years, shareholders have complained about the growing cash pile and I am glad management is taking this step now after accumulating years of reserves through conservative stewardship. I guess management is now confident enough on the rapidly growing wireless business which has been generating solid cash flows.
With cash of $39.233m or $1.12 per share, I expect PM Data to be able to easily give back at least 50cts in capital to shareholders. It would be interesting to see how the market values its wireless business once the cash and property are eventually distributed.
While others are doing rights issue, drawing down debt lines to support cash-flow during Covid-19 pandemic outbreak, our company is 'troubled' by how much cash to give back.
(Not a recommendation to buy or sell, just stating facts)
Posts: 120
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
1
Anyone familiar with capital reduction process? I notice their disclosures in the latest FS says they have been in touch with SGX Reg-co? this language wasn't there back in the October announcement.
I'm also surprised why don't they just maintain the dividend first and do a slightly smaller capital reduction later.
Posts: 4,258
Threads: 93
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
85
Here is my layman understanding of capital reduction (been some time since i experienced it):
- The equity of a company is mainly made up of share capital and retained profits (for simplicity sake, we will leave out other portions like reserves, treasury shares etc). Dividends are paid out of retained profits, while capital reduction is paid out of share capital.
- According to Companies Act, one has to apply to the Court to get approval for capital reduction (paying out of share capital). You have to prove that you are solvent even after you distribute out the cash etc etc. A capital reduction also needs to be passed via a special resolution. A special resolution requires minimum 75% of shareholders present and voting.
- So one can't really pay out a large excess of cash from the share capital portion of the equity via dividends (a normal resolution that needs a simple majority). There are some exceptions if your retained earnings are negative though, which was discussed some time back on VB in another thread. I reckon no difference in admin costs if you need a capital reduction exercise to pay out the additional cash.
I am not a certified financial advisor and so nothing of what I say should be construed as financial advice. Please consult a certified financial advisor for advice instead.
Posts: 336
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
7
I believe capital reduction cost more. While cost varies between co. Getting an EGM done easily cost 10K and above and might be a couple of 10K if the co. is willing to spend.
Powermatic Group and Co. lvl B/S especially equity portion says capital reduction make sense if powermatic want to distribute anywhere close to 30M.
Posts: 2,512
Threads: 24
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
19
i would invest more into capax now with the cash hoard, rather then distribute out... it just does not make sense to not fully maximize their cash bullets in the next few months... buy a new building/ office property or something... !
1) Try NOT to LOSE money!
2) Do NOT SELL in BEAR, BUY-BUY-BUY! invest in managements/companies that does the same!
3) CASH in hand is KING in BEAR!
4) In BULL, SELL-SELL-SELL!