ValueBuddies.com : Value Investing Forum - Singapore, Hong Kong, U.S. › ValueBuddies.com › Personal Finance v
CPF was "100 per cent safe''

CPF was "100 per cent safe''

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
tanjm Offline
Member
***
Posts: 456
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 21
#13
23-06-2014, 11:21 PM
(23-06-2014, 04:08 PM)DP28 Wrote:
(23-06-2014, 04:00 PM)weijian Wrote:
(23-06-2014, 03:25 PM)GPD Wrote:
(23-06-2014, 02:18 PM)specuvestor Wrote: Funny why he use the past tense Big Grin
Haha! Exactly what I noticed as well. Intentional or unintentional?

Well, the past tense was in context to GFC (which happened in the past). I am pretty sure Mr Lim continues to feel rich when he looks at his CPF statement. Smile

Haha you guys are hilarious. But I agree you guys really did read the fine prints well

I guess the creator of bitcoin probably took the idea out of our CPF concept. maybe it is virtual money afterall. Money you will never see..

In that case, I will pay you 50 cents cash for every dollar you have in CPF right now. You just have to give me all of your annuity payments, any excess you have over minimum sum and avoid drawing CPF for housing, medical, and education.

Deal or not?
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Lancelot - 23-06-2014, 01:54 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 23-06-2014, 02:18 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by GPD - 23-06-2014, 03:25 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by weijian - 23-06-2014, 04:00 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by DP28 - 23-06-2014, 04:08 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 23-06-2014, 05:05 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tanjm - 23-06-2014, 11:21 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by LionFlyer - 23-06-2014, 05:33 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by weijian - 23-06-2014, 10:26 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 09:35 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by kagemusha - 23-06-2014, 03:20 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by GPD - 23-06-2014, 03:28 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by touzi - 23-06-2014, 11:34 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 09:39 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 23-06-2014, 05:37 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 09:46 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 24-06-2014, 09:38 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 24-06-2014, 11:06 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 24-06-2014, 12:29 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by investor101 - 24-06-2014, 03:05 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by izam - 24-06-2014, 07:38 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Zelphon - 24-06-2014, 07:58 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by WolfT - 24-06-2014, 08:13 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by izam - 24-06-2014, 10:53 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 24-06-2014, 11:37 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by ksir - 24-06-2014, 12:37 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 24-06-2014, 03:03 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 03:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by ksir - 24-06-2014, 04:05 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 04:29 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by ksir - 24-06-2014, 03:21 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 24-06-2014, 03:30 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by kagemusha - 24-06-2014, 04:43 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Lancelot - 24-06-2014, 04:55 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 04:58 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by GPD - 24-06-2014, 05:04 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 05:10 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by GPD - 24-06-2014, 05:29 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 24-06-2014, 08:46 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 24-06-2014, 09:17 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 25-06-2014, 02:42 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by kagemusha - 25-06-2014, 01:30 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 25-06-2014, 10:08 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by ksir - 24-06-2014, 05:07 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by thefarside - 25-06-2014, 08:00 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 25-06-2014, 10:34 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 25-06-2014, 10:52 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc - 25-06-2014, 04:30 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 25-06-2014, 04:34 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 25-06-2014, 08:13 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 11:34 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 02:07 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 03:02 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 26-06-2014, 03:27 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 03:37 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 26-06-2014, 04:19 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 03:42 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 26-06-2014, 02:23 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 03:30 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 03:43 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 26-06-2014, 07:08 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 03:54 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by kagemusha - 27-06-2014, 02:01 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-06-2014, 04:12 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 04:03 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 04:22 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 04:41 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 05:02 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 04:33 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 04:40 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 04:49 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 05:14 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 26-06-2014, 05:40 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 05:58 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 09:42 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-06-2014, 02:20 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 09:33 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc88 - 26-06-2014, 10:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 26-06-2014, 10:56 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 08:31 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-06-2014, 08:40 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 09:33 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 09:45 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 27-06-2014, 09:54 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 10:06 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 10:22 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 10:26 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 11:13 AM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc88 - 27-06-2014, 12:21 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 27-06-2014, 09:56 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CY09 - 27-06-2014, 10:47 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 10:52 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 27-06-2014, 11:02 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 11:03 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 11:21 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 11:40 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 27-06-2014, 11:58 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 11:46 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by yeokiwi - 27-06-2014, 12:58 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 27-06-2014, 01:20 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 27-06-2014, 01:23 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tanjm - 27-06-2014, 10:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 02:00 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 27-06-2014, 02:30 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-06-2014, 02:42 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CY09 - 27-06-2014, 10:44 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tanjm - 28-06-2014, 12:10 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by egghead - 28-06-2014, 09:43 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 28-06-2014, 11:35 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 28-06-2014, 12:08 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by NTL - 28-06-2014, 12:27 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 28-06-2014, 12:35 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc88 - 28-06-2014, 12:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by NTL - 28-06-2014, 12:59 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Porkbelly - 28-06-2014, 01:57 PM
CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by chialc88 - 28-06-2014, 02:33 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 29-06-2014, 11:43 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by NTL - 29-06-2014, 12:08 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Fish Head - 29-06-2014, 12:10 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 30-06-2014, 12:18 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by corydorus - 09-07-2014, 09:27 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 09-07-2014, 09:32 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by HitandRun - 09-07-2014, 09:39 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 09-07-2014, 10:10 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by HitandRun - 09-07-2014, 01:27 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 09-07-2014, 01:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by HitandRun - 09-07-2014, 01:53 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 09-07-2014, 11:03 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 03:45 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Freenasi - 09-07-2014, 04:32 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by CityFarmer - 09-07-2014, 05:04 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 04:49 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by nsengkia - 09-07-2014, 05:15 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tanjm - 09-07-2014, 06:14 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 09-07-2014, 06:50 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by aspeed - 09-07-2014, 05:25 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 05:35 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 09-07-2014, 05:46 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 05:54 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 09-07-2014, 06:01 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by specuvestor - 09-07-2014, 06:49 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by freedom - 09-07-2014, 06:05 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 09-07-2014, 06:40 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by SincereKen - 26-03-2015, 01:15 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by NTL - 27-03-2015, 04:23 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by vesfreq - 27-03-2015, 11:36 AM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by SincereKen - 01-04-2015, 05:49 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Porkbelly - 26-03-2015, 08:41 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by Temperament - 27-03-2015, 05:22 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by tikam tikam - 27-03-2015, 05:50 PM
RE: CPF was "100 per cent safe'' - by SincereKen - 01-04-2015, 06:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)