ValueBuddies.com : Value Investing Forum - Singapore, Hong Kong, U.S.

Full Version: Chip Eng Seng
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(13-02-2015, 09:24 AM)westin1 Wrote: [ -> ]Looking weak now... may break down soon....
Maybe upcoming result bad....
Ermmm... Why say looking bad? If looking bad, earlier on was worse. Not long ago, ces was doing 97 cents n went back down to 83 cents

Price is the function of sentiments of various market participants. But, value is what each participant see. We should be looking at the value rather than sheer price movements. Prices can be erratic and may not correlate with the business. Just my view.

It will help forumers a lot more if you can substantiate why you feel that the counter will not do well. Price fluctuation is surely not a convincing point. Or is there certain news that you knew which was not mentioned in the press?
Thanks vesfreq....im looking more on the tecnical aspect....stilll learning from the masters here... hope im wrong....
(13-02-2015, 11:09 AM)westin1 Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks vesfreq....im looking more on the tecnical aspect....stilll learning from the masters here... hope im wrong....

Ermm.... the value add in the forum is really that the discussions have "substance", like what curiousparty did with his in depth views.

If you look at technical aspect only, then a lot of stocks cannot buy liao cos they would easily be in the red with all the adverse market news such as peace talks in russia, crude oil glut and etc.

Just my two cents. To quote another forumer "price is what you pay and value is what you get." Probably thats why the forums is named "valuebuddies" instead of "technicalbuddies". Confused

Shall let the topic pass. Its already off topic. Also thought the view you had sounded very "unvaluebuddy". Do share any of the news, rather than on the basis of price movements. Like I said before 97 to 83 cents in the past not long ago should have caused many to dump the stocks, if we had used price as the sole basis for decision making.
Got it... hopefully this is indeed an undervalued gem.. Smile
I say, price is what you paid and price is what you get when you sell, not peanuts. haha.
Correct me if the statement is factually wrong.
97 cents is Major Resistance. Any news on Fulcrum sales and Melbourne project?
Don't have to worry much at 97 resistance.
Current NAV = 91 cents.

CES is going to report ~20cents EPS gain for Q4 alone.
Smile


(15-02-2015, 11:12 PM)BeDisciplined Wrote: [ -> ]97 cents is Major Resistance. Any news on Fulcrum sales and Melbourne project?
Hopefully it will act as a catalyst to break above $1.00 when they report on 24th Feb 2015.
Even if it doesn't break above $1, it goes to show how much Mr Market is undervaluing CES.

With RNAV hovering at ~$1.70 (very conservative), it might not be long before some big investors realize its true value.

CES is fast building up its recurring income baseline. We can see it strongly materializing from 2H 2015 onwards Smile

(16-02-2015, 09:46 AM)westin1 Wrote: [ -> ]Hopefully it will act as a catalyst to break above $1.00 when they report on 24th Feb 2015.
Dear Curiousparty,

Indeed a big investor named Mr. Tan Yong Keng, spent $5.72 million to purchase 7.8 million shares over 5 days previously in 2013.

https://www.fool.sg/2013/02/18/insiders-...ke-a-peek/

Tan Yong Keng recorded his first sale in construction firm Chip Eng Seng Corporation Limited since he became a substantial shareholder in January 2013 with 1.62 million shares sold on September 26 2014 at an estimated price of 90 cents each. The trade reduced his deemed holdings to 50.179 million shares or 7.97% of the issued capital. The sale was made on the back of the 26% rise in the share price since May from 71.5 cents. The counter is also sharply up since September 2013 from 64 cents. He previously acquired 16.23 million shares from January 29 to February 27, 2013 at estimated prices of 74 cents to 85 cents each and an initial filing on January 28, 2013 of 4.78 million shares at 72 cents each, which raised his deemed interest by 16% to 5.5%.

http://asia-insider-news.com/news/newsDetails/8758

(16-02-2015, 11:08 PM)Curiousparty Wrote: [ -> ]Even if it doesn't break above $1, it goes to show how much Mr Market is undervaluing CES.

With RNAV hovering at ~$1.70 (very conservative), it might not be long before some big investors realize its true value.

CES is fast building up its recurring income baseline. We can see it strongly materializing from 2H 2015 onwards Smile

(16-02-2015, 09:46 AM)westin1 Wrote: [ -> ]Hopefully it will act as a catalyst to break above $1.00 when they report on 24th Feb 2015.