27-09-2015, 11:30 PM
Yellen keen to start raising US rates but deflation dangers abound
[Image: 199342-4bc81250-64d4-11e5-ae2c-91350e74fa5b.jpg]
US Federal Reserve chairwoman Janet Yellen. Source: AFP
[b]The 90th birthday party of Milton Freidman, the great monetarist economist and Nobel Laureate, was held in 2002. Ben Bernanke gave the keynote address, at the end of which Bernanke made a solemn promise. Speaking directly to Friedman, Bernanke said: “You were right, we did it. We’re very sorry. But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.”[/b]
Do what again? Bernanke was referring to the Fed’s raising of interest rates during the Great Depression. He was promising that the US Federal Reserve would never again be the cause of deflation and a collapse in the economy by tightening monetary policy too early in an economic recovery.
By not raising rates this month, Janet Yellen, who is Bernanke’s successor as chairwoman of the Fed, continued to honour his pledge to Freidman. But Yellen’s stated intention is to start raising interest rates before the end of the year and perhaps as soon as the Fed’s next meeting on 28 October.
Yellen’s central motivation for raising rates, despite the obvious risks, is to “get back to normal”. The collapse of Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008, was a fast motion train wreck.
Many parts of the economy were badly broken, but they are now mostly fixed: the banking system is better capitalised than before the crisis; the US budget deficit is back to normal levels; stock, bond and real estate prices are if anything too high; joblessness is down to 5.1 per cent and annual GDP growth has been close to its long-term trend for more than a year.
Only two things remain broken. Firstly, monetary policy, with short-term rates still near zero and the Fed’s balance sheet grotesquely distorted by quantitative easing. Secondly, consumer and business confidence.
Yellen believes that the first begets the second. If interest rates could get back to normal then the GFC would be fully in the rear vision mirror for US households and businesses. The crisis sentiment that has dogged the economy since 2007 would then finally lift and the final piece — confidence — would fall into place.
Ideally, the growing US economy, combined with green shoots of growth in Europe, and falling energy prices will counter a slowdown in developing economies and allow the global economy to finally reach escape velocity from the GFC.
But many economists consider that happy talk and fear that Yellen may later this year make a mistake of historic proportions. They worry that the Fed is severely underestimating the strength of deflationary forces in the global economy. Inflation fell rapidly in every major economy last year. That was the third episode of rapid disinflation since the GFC started. The first two episodes were met with massive rounds of government spending and quantitative easing. Inflation has stabilised this year but is still close to zero in the US, even closer in Europe and negative in Japan and Britain.
Much of the developed world is horrified by Yellen’s intentions and are implementing policies that are the polar opposite. Japan is full steam ahead with its crash or crash through QE program.
The European Central Bank, under governor Mario Draghi, intends to continue its €60 billion per month QE program until healthy levels of inflation are restored.
Larry Summers, who was President Barack Obama’s first choice as Bernanke’s successor, believes that deflationary forces have been building for decades and that the GFC is in part a result of those forces rather than the cause.
Summers popularised the term “secular stagnation”, which refers to an enduring state of supply of goods exceeding demand. The dearth of demand is resulting from the greying of populations, the shift of high-paid jobs in the developed world to low-paid jobs in developing countries, and the concentration of wealth in families who save more than they spend. The excess of supply is resulting from technological improvements and globalisation.
The central tension in the decision about when to raise interest rates is that Yellen gives primacy to the need to “fix the last piece” to finally restore US economic confidence, whereas her detractors worry that the Fed “doesn’t get it” about global deflation.
As much as I admire Yellen and her determination to get the GFC behind us, I am in the Summers and Draghi camp — deflation is not defeated and poses a grave danger to the global economy. Janet Yellen might do well to reaffirm Bernanke’s promise.
Sam Wylie is a Principal Fellow of the Melbourne Business School
- SAM WYLIE
- THE AUSTRALIAN
- SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 12:00AM
[Image: 199342-4bc81250-64d4-11e5-ae2c-91350e74fa5b.jpg]
US Federal Reserve chairwoman Janet Yellen. Source: AFP
[b]The 90th birthday party of Milton Freidman, the great monetarist economist and Nobel Laureate, was held in 2002. Ben Bernanke gave the keynote address, at the end of which Bernanke made a solemn promise. Speaking directly to Friedman, Bernanke said: “You were right, we did it. We’re very sorry. But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.”[/b]
Do what again? Bernanke was referring to the Fed’s raising of interest rates during the Great Depression. He was promising that the US Federal Reserve would never again be the cause of deflation and a collapse in the economy by tightening monetary policy too early in an economic recovery.
By not raising rates this month, Janet Yellen, who is Bernanke’s successor as chairwoman of the Fed, continued to honour his pledge to Freidman. But Yellen’s stated intention is to start raising interest rates before the end of the year and perhaps as soon as the Fed’s next meeting on 28 October.
Yellen’s central motivation for raising rates, despite the obvious risks, is to “get back to normal”. The collapse of Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008, was a fast motion train wreck.
Many parts of the economy were badly broken, but they are now mostly fixed: the banking system is better capitalised than before the crisis; the US budget deficit is back to normal levels; stock, bond and real estate prices are if anything too high; joblessness is down to 5.1 per cent and annual GDP growth has been close to its long-term trend for more than a year.
Only two things remain broken. Firstly, monetary policy, with short-term rates still near zero and the Fed’s balance sheet grotesquely distorted by quantitative easing. Secondly, consumer and business confidence.
Yellen believes that the first begets the second. If interest rates could get back to normal then the GFC would be fully in the rear vision mirror for US households and businesses. The crisis sentiment that has dogged the economy since 2007 would then finally lift and the final piece — confidence — would fall into place.
Ideally, the growing US economy, combined with green shoots of growth in Europe, and falling energy prices will counter a slowdown in developing economies and allow the global economy to finally reach escape velocity from the GFC.
But many economists consider that happy talk and fear that Yellen may later this year make a mistake of historic proportions. They worry that the Fed is severely underestimating the strength of deflationary forces in the global economy. Inflation fell rapidly in every major economy last year. That was the third episode of rapid disinflation since the GFC started. The first two episodes were met with massive rounds of government spending and quantitative easing. Inflation has stabilised this year but is still close to zero in the US, even closer in Europe and negative in Japan and Britain.
Much of the developed world is horrified by Yellen’s intentions and are implementing policies that are the polar opposite. Japan is full steam ahead with its crash or crash through QE program.
The European Central Bank, under governor Mario Draghi, intends to continue its €60 billion per month QE program until healthy levels of inflation are restored.
Larry Summers, who was President Barack Obama’s first choice as Bernanke’s successor, believes that deflationary forces have been building for decades and that the GFC is in part a result of those forces rather than the cause.
Summers popularised the term “secular stagnation”, which refers to an enduring state of supply of goods exceeding demand. The dearth of demand is resulting from the greying of populations, the shift of high-paid jobs in the developed world to low-paid jobs in developing countries, and the concentration of wealth in families who save more than they spend. The excess of supply is resulting from technological improvements and globalisation.
The central tension in the decision about when to raise interest rates is that Yellen gives primacy to the need to “fix the last piece” to finally restore US economic confidence, whereas her detractors worry that the Fed “doesn’t get it” about global deflation.
As much as I admire Yellen and her determination to get the GFC behind us, I am in the Summers and Draghi camp — deflation is not defeated and poses a grave danger to the global economy. Janet Yellen might do well to reaffirm Bernanke’s promise.
Sam Wylie is a Principal Fellow of the Melbourne Business School