ValueBuddies.com : Value Investing Forum - Singapore, Hong Kong, U.S.

Full Version: Corporate/Business challenge
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Media agency Ate Group founded by Aun Koh, son of Professor Tommy Koh is suing three ex-staff for allegedly setting up a rival agency and poaching clients from Ate while under its employment.

Ate’s clients have included Jamie’s Italian Singapore, Singapore Tourism Board, MasterCard, DBS Bank, National Heritage Board, Unilever Food Solutions, Louis Vuitton and The Peninsula Hotels Group.

Ate was founded in 2006 by Aun Koh, son of celebrated Singaporean lawyer and diplomat Professor Tommy Koh, and his wife. Koh no longer has an operational role at Ate, but remains a partner in the business.

In a long post on his Facebook page, Koh wrote:

[Image: Picture-88-234x264.png]
Aun Koh

I have been completely disgusted by the unprofessional and possibly criminal actions by three former employees (coincidentally, all foreigners).

From what I have been told, these three, over a period of time and while actually under our employment, allegedly worked to divert business away from us and to their new agency.

Allegedly, they lied to my business partners, misrepresented our agency, and even lied to clients.

Allegedly, they were, while still drawing salaries from us, selling their own services and poaching Ate’s clients.

Now, I have no problem with competition. And as I said, I’m happy to see my ex-colleagues succeed. But there are certain moral codes that people and professionals should adhere to.

These three, in my personal opinion, have demonstrated a complete lack of integrity and professionalism. To me, they have lost any kind of credibility not only as professionals but human beings.

I am actually shocked that some of our clients signed up with their new firm and am simply hoping they were misled, as opposed to actually supporting this behaviour.

It actually saddens me that in order to seek justice my partners are pursuing both legal and criminal action against these people. I don’t understand why three supposedly intelligent people couldn’t wait until they no longer worked for us to pursue new business.

Why do something so obviously wrong? Why not part ways on good terms and compete then? There’s surely enough business out there for many, many communications companies?

What also saddens me about this incident is that I was always a huge supported of foreign (white collar) labor here in Singapore. While I know these people are surely not indicative of a huge population of expatriates, it does make me rethink whether or not these new arrivals are really grateful for the opportunities they are being given here or are they all just so self-centered that they don’t care about things like professionalism, integrity or even right and wrong.

I won’t be naming these people here. I’m not that stupid or petty. But friends from various sectors can guess who they are. And I hope these friends won’t give these people or their business the time of day.

http://mumbrella.asia/2013/10/ate-threat...-poaching/
not business etiquette. this is about business ethics.

clients also very funny. Anyone who can play out their bosses, will probably play out the clients.
Why single out foreigner? Local born SGP won't do this sort of stuff meh?

Money talks... employee play out company, client play out company, company play out client and employee... etc. It has always happened.

This probably won't help his cause.
(25-10-2013, 11:53 AM)opmi Wrote: [ -> ]not business etiquette. this is about business ethics.

clients also very funny. Anyone who can play out their bosses, will probably play out the clients.

Yes, it is about business ethics.
(25-10-2013, 01:21 PM)LionFlyer Wrote: [ -> ]Why single out foreigner? Local born SGP won't do this sort of stuff meh?

Money talks... employee play out company, client play out company, company play out client and employee... etc. It has always happened.

This probably won't help his cause.

FT got less to lose? If flop, can chao lang back to home country.

Locals no where to run? Turn every corner also know people from Pri/Sec/JC/Poly/NS-BMT/NS-Sch/NSUnit/Uni/Reservist/1stJob/2ndJob.
SG very small.
(25-10-2013, 03:44 PM)opmi Wrote: [ -> ]
(25-10-2013, 01:21 PM)LionFlyer Wrote: [ -> ]Why single out foreigner? Local born SGP won't do this sort of stuff meh?

Money talks... employee play out company, client play out company, company play out client and employee... etc. It has always happened.

This probably won't help his cause.

FT got less to lose? If flop, can chao lang back to home country.

Locals no where to run? Turn every corner also know people from Pri/Sec/JC/Poly/NS-BMT/NS-Sch/NSUnit/Uni/Reservist/1stJob/2ndJob.
SG very small.

If every SGP is worried about losing face and running into friends and relatives, we would have a very well-behaved business community and it is not uncommon for local businessmen to run road too. I dunno, maybe there is a lot of things we don't know which could have elicited such a response from him.
Why he needed to highlight these 3 were foreigners ? Thought his father very pro FTs?
I can emphasize with his frustrations because my cousin experienced it also, somemore his good friends. Greed is powerful but I doubt it's always good

(25-10-2013, 11:53 AM)opmi Wrote: [ -> ]not business etiquette. this is about business ethics.

clients also very funny. Anyone who can play out their bosses, will probably play out the clients.

totally agree. Same irony for some bosses who ask employees to lie. If they can lie for u, they can lie to u. End of day business and relationships are based on trust.