Another building material company is Jason Holdings.
(10-09-2013, 08:13 AM)investingsgx Wrote: [ -> ]Hafary seems like a much bigger player. And seems much cheaper and attractive than jason holdings.
But whether competition are going against them is another question. Based on their FY2013 results, they are still facing high operations cost issue.
(not vested)
Jason listed only 2 years and already in red , lost 1.9m in first half of 2013. Small company can also lose so much .
SGX should check all these companies why they lose so much money immediately after listing . It is the retail investors who lose their monies.
(10-09-2013, 08:48 AM)Stocker Wrote: [ -> ] (10-09-2013, 08:13 AM)investingsgx Wrote: [ -> ]Hafary seems like a much bigger player. And seems much cheaper and attractive than jason holdings.
But whether competition are going against them is another question. Based on their FY2013 results, they are still facing high operations cost issue.
(not vested)
Jason listed only 2 years and already in red , lost 1.9m in first half of 2013. Small company can also lose so much .
SGX should check all these companies why they lose so much money immediately after listing . It is the retail investors who lose their monies.
High cost of transportation and manufacturing of materials are challenges faced by material companies, the lack of efficient and cost effective logistics / manufacturing plants will increase their burdens. Bigger companies tend to have a advantage over start-ups. Unless start-ups can find a way to mitigate these costs.
How such company can get listed ?
(15-09-2013, 04:05 PM)cfa Wrote: [ -> ]How such company can get listed ?
hahaha. Ya loh why. Together with some of the S-chips.
(15-09-2013, 06:06 PM)investingsgx Wrote: [ -> ] (15-09-2013, 04:05 PM)cfa Wrote: [ -> ]How such company can get listed ?
hahaha. Ya loh why. Together with some of the S-chips.
Because IPO still got people buy.
This company reported HY loss of 1.9m in Aug but share price has been more than double from 0.20.
Most of their assets are in receivable 27m vs share equity of 14.5m.
Gross margin of only 12.5m.
(28-02-2014, 09:24 AM)valueinvestor Wrote: [ -> ]This company reported HY loss of 1.9m in Aug but share price has been more than double from 0.20.
Most of their assets are in receivable 27m vs share equity of 14.5m.
Gross margin of only 12.5m.
Please take note to do a search for existing thread, before starting a new thread for a company.
There is an existing thread for Jason Holdings. I merged your new thread into the old one.
Regards
Moderator
(28-02-2014, 09:34 AM)CityFarmer Wrote: [ -> ] (28-02-2014, 09:24 AM)valueinvestor Wrote: [ -> ]This company reported HY loss of 1.9m in Aug but share price has been more than double from 0.20.
Most of their assets are in receivable 27m vs share equity of 14.5m.
Gross margin of only 12.5m.
Please take note to do a search for existing thread, before starting a new thread for a company.
There is an existing thread for Jason Holdings. I merged your new thread into the old one.
Regards
Moderator
Sorry for creating more work for you, will take note. Thanks.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED
ACQUISITION OF THE ENTIRE ISSUED AND PAID-UP SHARE CAPITAL OF TOP
CREATION INVESTMENT (HK) LIMITED (“MOU”)
– LETTER OF EXTENSION
http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/JH_MOU_E...eID=299463
Share price reacted positively (more than double) because of this MOU , if the deal is call off , would the share price back to square one ?