23-07-2013, 11:01 PM
(23-07-2013, 11:38 AM)NTL Wrote: [ -> ]If that's the case, then the next 2015/16 GE will see even more opposition members in parliament. Do you think they want to lose their so lucrative rice bowls? i don't think so.(23-07-2013, 11:27 AM)specuvestor Wrote: [ -> ](23-07-2013, 11:04 AM)kichialo Wrote: [ -> ](23-07-2013, 09:33 AM)Temperament Wrote: [ -> ]If SA 4% p/a is guaranteed, i think it is not bad if you can afford to treat it as an "asset allocation".
By the way, i am also treating my wife's RA as "asset allocation" as long as CPF is paying 4% p/a. But i know each of us have different investment situation. Just make sure you can get more than 4% p/a return and your SA's principal as safe as possible.
Shalom.
could this lifting be a precursor to scrapping the guaranteed 4%?
It is already scrapped around 3 years ago... officially it should be pegged to 10 year +1% but govt continued to maintain it at 4%. It is no longer carved in stone.
http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/CPF/News/News-Re...un2013.htm
Rumored that they no longer want to maintain it from next yr onwards. Present 10yr bond stands at around 2.4-2.5%, so SA rate will drop to 3.5%?
In fact i think more and more goodies will be given to sweetened the ground as much as possible as the time approaches nearer and nearer 2015/2016 GE. We have had seen this in the past. Then after the GE, they will take it back more than they have given you.
Please beware and be careful.