ValueBuddies.com : Value Investing Forum - Singapore, Hong Kong, U.S.

Full Version: Jack-up rigs: Chinese make presence felt
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Lynn Kan
The Business Times
Wednesday, Apr 17, 2013

SINGAPORE - First Dalian Shipbuilding, now China Rongsheng Heavy Industries.

This year could be remembered as when Chinese shipbuilders-turned-offshore builders sealed more jack-up rig deals than Singapore's Keppel Corporation and Sembcorp Marine, the de facto hegemons in jack-up rigs that had a hand in building 70 per cent of the existing global fleet.

A report by Religare Capital showed that Chinese yards have won US$2.73 billion in jack-up rigs, while the Singapore duo hauled in only US$1.97 billion to-date.

"There's a substantial glut in shipbuilding capacity in China and the yards aren't getting orders so they're making a push into offshore," said Religare Capital analyst Vincent Fernando.

"Since 2006, Chinese shipyards have started to grow their market share, moving up the learning curve and delivering on new projects," said Barclays Research analysts Scott Darling and Clement Chen in a recent report.

Chinese yards are not the only ones that covet pole position. Other shipbuilder-turned-rig builders in Korea like Hyundai Heavy Industries, Samsung Heavy Industries and Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering have been busy too, securing orders for drillships that operate in ultradeepwater.

The stand-off between the Singapore rigbuilders and others from China and Korea has been brewing for some years, since shipping entered a slump.

But the moment for capturing more market share is now.

The aged global rig fleet is in need of replacement as consumption for energy increases in emerging economies. Of the world's 500 jack-up rigs, about 300 are over 30 years old.

A new jack-up rig could set back a drilling operator or national oil company by about US$200 million at current prices. And now, their choices are not confined to the top five yards in Singapore or Korea any longer: China yards like Cosco, CIMC Raffles, and Dalian Shipbuilding have entered the picture.

Barclays estimates that, In the past decade, Chinese yards have grown their market share of rigs from 5 per cent to about 30 per cent currently.

And it could increase further. Religare Capital surmised that Chinese yards will be capable of rivalling Singapore yards in terms of rig production capacity by 2015.

The Barclays projections corroborate that: China yards may capture 10 percentage points more of market share in the next two years.

While the perception is that Chinese yards stick to less complex and commoditised jack-up rigs, and are not competing head-on with the likes of Keppel and Sembmarine, that has proven to be increasingly untrue.

"CIMC Raffles in early January won orders for two high spec deepwater semisubmersibles from (Cyprus-based) Frigstad Offshore. These rigs are more advanced than most being built in Singapore right now," said Mr Fernando.

The dealbreaker was more attractive contract terms offered by Chinese yards, he added.

State backing has meant Chinese yards often offer discounts between 10-20 per cent off contract prices and extremely attractive payment terms of a one cent downpayment upfront and 99 per cent of the contract value upon delivery.

In contrast, Singapore yards have a milestone payment system or a 20 per cent-80 per cent payment structure.

But CIMB stands by their belief that the Chinese financier-builder model will not deprive Singapore yards of their fair share of order wins.

"Traditional drillers with stronger cash flows should still find comfort in Singapore and Korean yards, unwilling to take on risks in quality and delivery," said CIMB.

Yet, the aggression shown by Chinese yards has led to a drop-off in operating margins of rig projects, reported Keppel Corp and Sembmarine last year.

Gone were the boom eras of margins that could go as high as 20 per cent. Instead, going forward, management for both companies are keeping to more modest ranges of between 10 and 13 per cent.

"For yards in general - whether in Singapore or China - they will see a weakening in pricing power because they're competing against each other for business," said Mr Fernando.

For now, Singapore yards have articulated clearly that their competitiveness hinges on a mixture of productivity gains and innovation.

"We recognise that there is increased competition in the rigbuilding sphere but we are confident that Keppel Offshore & Marine is able to distance itself through innovation, technology and experience," COO of Keppel Offshore and Marine, Chow Yew Yuen told BT.

Keppel has pursued a strategy of "Near Market, Near Customer", setting up overseas yards in markets like the US, Brazil and China to tap on interest from oil and gas regions around the world and to meet local content demands, said Mr Chow.

And Sembmarine will be shifting from its Jurong premises to a new Tuas Integrated Yard later this year. The new space is configured to minimise the movement of manpower and materials.

This year, Yangzijiang chairman Ren Yuanlin told BT that one way for Singapore yards to keep their edge over Chinese yards is to partner with them.

Know-how is Singapore's strong suit while China has labour, a resource Singapore has sore demand for.

Yangzijiang itself pursued this strategy in 2010 when it bought over Baker Technology's 15 per cent stake in Sembmarine rigbuilding subsidiary PPL Shipyard, sharing board seats with Sembmarine.

However, the investment turned into a litigious affair, that is now before the Court of Appeal, belying Singapore yards' discomfort to relinquish its intellectual property and knowhow easily to overseas competitors.

Setting aside the issue of PPL Shipyard, Mr Ren said collaboration still makes sense to Singapore yards. "The problem is whether there is mindset and willingness to do it. But if Singapore yards want to keep their number one spot, they have to consider ways of collaboration with Chinese yards," said Mr Ren.

http://business.asiaone.com/news/jack-ri...sence-felt
The WheelofFortune can not be stop. "风 水 轮 流 转”
(17-04-2013, 08:38 AM)Boon Wrote: [ -> ]Lynn Kan
The Business Times
Wednesday, Apr 17, 2013

...
This year, Yangzijiang chairman Ren Yuanlin told BT that one way for Singapore yards to keep their edge over Chinese yards is to partner with them.

Know-how is Singapore's strong suit while China has labour, a resource Singapore has sore demand for.

...

http://business.asiaone.com/news/jack-ri...sence-felt

And once your technology of building high end rigs is learnt by your partners, you are slowly forgotten. They make you leave the partnership "voluntarily" and they compete with you again in the open market. Well done.
(17-04-2013, 09:45 AM)safetyfirst Wrote: [ -> ]
(17-04-2013, 08:38 AM)Boon Wrote: [ -> ]Lynn Kan
The Business Times
Wednesday, Apr 17, 2013

...
This year, Yangzijiang chairman Ren Yuanlin told BT that one way for Singapore yards to keep their edge over Chinese yards is to partner with them.

Know-how is Singapore's strong suit while China has labour, a resource Singapore has sore demand for.

...

http://business.asiaone.com/news/jack-ri...sence-felt

And once your technology of building high end rigs is learnt by your partners, you are slowly forgotten. They make you leave the partnership "voluntarily" and they compete with you again in the open market. Well done.

Sound good to YZJ Tongue
Bad news for Singapore companies.

Perhaps, the Government should consider allowing more experienced China shipyard workers to convert to Singapore citizenship to resolve the labour issue. Ultimately, Singapore has a projected population growth to meet and we need to maintain our competitive advantage as a nation.
The time of high margin from rig seems over
Gonna be a tough fight for our local rigbuilders.
(17-04-2013, 09:45 AM)safetyfirst Wrote: [ -> ]
(17-04-2013, 08:38 AM)Boon Wrote: [ -> ]Lynn Kan
The Business Times
Wednesday, Apr 17, 2013

...
This year, Yangzijiang chairman Ren Yuanlin told BT that one way for Singapore yards to keep their edge over Chinese yards is to partner with them.

Know-how is Singapore's strong suit while China has labour, a resource Singapore has sore demand for.

...

http://business.asiaone.com/news/jack-ri...sence-felt

And once your technology of building high end rigs is learnt by your partners, you are slowly forgotten. They make you leave the partnership "voluntarily" and they compete with you again in the open market. Well done.
Of course! It already happens to SHINKANSEN. And Japan so far can not do any thing. What is the little RED DOT to China? Nothing is going to change much to China if little RED DOT disappears overnight. Or for this matter, nothing much to the world too.
And why "IBM" sold its computer manufacturing unit to CHINA's Lenovo? i suppose many more other foreign companies face the same problem.
Quote:And once your technology of building high end rigs is learnt by your partners, you are slowly forgotten. They make you leave the partnership "voluntarily" and they compete with you again in the open market. Well done.

Quote:Of course! It already happens to SHINKANSEN. And Japan so far can not do any thing. What is the little RED DOT to China? Nothing is going to change much to China if little RED DOT disappears overnight. Or for this matter, nothing much to the world too.
And why "IBM" sold its computer manufacturing unit to CHINA's Lenovo? i suppose many more other foreign companies face the same problem.

All went in with their eyes open all those years ago lah, this is not the first time anybody know that china always try to duplicate everything. I read some years back Japanese rail industry was in a slump the china rail development was a life saver for them. Before that they would have heard of Suzhou Ind park how the chinese screwed us over by going behind out backs and building similar parks in other places they could have backed out that time why didn't they? Simple explaination we were all greedy or we wanted cheap labor or access into their markets or all of the above.

We all swallowed line hook and sinker all of it Big Grin
Extracts from DBSV report dated 17-Apr-13,

WHO HAS BEEN ORDERING FROM THE CHINESE YARDS?
• Chinese yards win US$2.3b jack-up orders
• Many clients have short operating history
• Look beyond the surface

Chinese yards’ jack-up orders YTD surpass Singapore’s…
There have been recent reports on Chinese yards surpassing Singapore yards in terms of jack-up rig orders YTD. Indeed, we find that jack-up orders for the former have totaled ~US$2.3b so far, compared to ~US$2.1b for the latter. Should this pace keep up till the end of the year, it will be a significant milestone in the history of Chinese rigbuilding.

… but most orders from newcomers in the industry
However, we note that many of the contracts that Chinese yards have won so far are mostly from newcomers in the offshore industry, including speculators who sell the rigs later for a profit. Very favourable payment terms have been extended to these customers e.g. Prospector Offshore’s downpayment was only 6.5% with Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding (SWS).

Prudent strategy has its merits
As Exhibit 1 shows, for contracts secured this year, most of the customers of Chinese yards are not leading players in the industry, with the exception of Seadrill. In comparison, Keppel's and Sembmarine's customers are generally more established players. This has proven to be a prudent strategy – recently there has been news of Prospector Offshore facing financing challenges on its rig newbuilds. The company currently also risks losing some of its cash at a Cyprus bank. According to Upstream1, Prospector has six jack-ups under order at SWS and Dalian Shipbuilding.

Product innovation and diversification
In our view, the Chinese yards do present a challenge to the incumbents, and we expect stiff competition as they scale the learning curve over time. Meanwhile, Keppel Corp (KEP) and Sembcorp Marine (SMM) have been diversifying their product range and innovating to stay ahead in certain niche areas. YTD, KEP has secured orders worth S$2.2b, while SMM has won S$1.6b, accounting for 43% and 39% of our full year estimates, respectively. Maintain BUY on both KEP [FV: S$12.68] and SMM [FV: S$5.64]; we note that markets may be increasingly volatile ahead, providing an opportune time to enter such quality stocks.

<Not Vested>
Pages: 1 2