ValueBuddies.com : Value Investing Forum - Singapore, Hong Kong, U.S.

Full Version: Get medical cover while you are healthy
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Pretty good advice! Makes me want to check if my own parents are insured for H&S!

The Straits Times
www.straitstimes.com
Published on Nov 11, 2012
Small change
Get medical cover while you are healthy

Those who rely solely on employers' health plan may find it hard to get alternative cover when they retire

By Goh Eng Yeow Senior Correspondent

Watching Hong Kong film-maker Ann Hui's tear- jerker A Simple Life some months ago, I got the sense of how it is like to grow old all alone, fall sick and then having to kill time as death beckons.

It starred Andy Lau as a film producer called Roger, who lives in an old apartment with his ageing maid-cum-nanny Ah Tao, played by veteran actress Deannie Ip.

When Ah Tao suffers a stroke and asks to be put in an old folks' home, Roger finds her one and takes on the task of keeping her company, taking her out to restaurants during weekends and looking out for her as she had always done for him.

Through the eyes of Ah Tao, the drama unfolds simply in the old folks' home, where the harsh fluorescent lights and unwashed toilets only heighten the sense of loneliness she must feel as she contemplates the end of her life.

Yet it was not a movie about despair. Rather, it's a story about how an old woman manages to make the most of her remaining days and nights as her mental and physical abilities deteriorate, with Roger, who had seemed callous and aloof at first, becoming her life support and caregiver.

And that brings me to my point: As Singapore ages, there will be plenty of Ah Taos in our midst. At least, the film's character can count on Roger to foot her bills at the hospital and old folks' home. Many of us may not find ourselves in similarly fortuitous circumstances.

So it is of paramount importance for all of us to do some form of financial planning as early as possible, while we are healthy and our earning ability is at its peak.

The worst possible fate that can befall anyone is to be saddled with a huge medical bill in old age with no one and no income to rely on.

That is why the first question to ask in doing any financial planning is whether you have adequate medical coverage.

At least, we have the MediShield insurance scheme to fall back on.

This is a low-cost plan introduced in 1990 to help Central Provident Fund (CPF) members meet medical expenses. The good thing about it is that Singaporeans and permanent residents are automatically covered when they start contributing to CPF.

But there is one snag: Some Singaporeans choose to opt out of MediShield when they retire or are no longer working because they no longer have any CPF contributions.

These are the people who fall into the age group that needs the medical coverage most. But since MediShield premiums go up with age, they are reluctant to pay out heftier and heftier sums for the coverage in order to conserve their slender cash resources.

Then there are those who have relied on their company's insurance plan all their working life. But when they retire, they find they cannot get any coverage because they have developed medical problems such as high blood pressure or diabetes.

That is a pity. It may also be a case of being penny wise and pound foolish.

Recently, a friend's 86-year-old father died after spending three months in a private and then public hospital. The medical bills totalled more than $300,000 in all but as he had no medical insurance coverage, his family had to settle them with hard cash.

It is a lesson worth noting. There is no telling when a disaster may strike - and it may turn out to be very costly if you are not prepared.

When the Government revamped MediShield earlier this year, it decided to scrap the maximum entry age - now 75 - for joining the low-cost scheme.

To cater to our rapidly ageing population, it would also be extending coverage to people up to age 90, from 85 now. It would also invite about 1,700 people aged 86 to 90, who had previously been covered by MediShield, to join the scheme again.

Hopefully, those who are 75 and above will take advantage of the Government's initiative, which kicks off in March next year.

After my column in July urging Singaporeans to buy medical insurance for their parents, one reader wrote to me to relate her tale of woe.

Last year, her father's MediShield coverage was terminated as he had turned 85. He had been healthy and had never made a claim even though he had been insured since its inception 22 years ago.

Shortly after that, he suffered a massive stroke and she had to foot his medical bills in full.

It was cruel bad luck and I fully sympathise with her and her family. For those in the pink of health, it is a reminder that the unforeseen can and does happen.

engyeow@sph.com.sg
(11-11-2012, 09:19 AM)Musicwhiz Wrote: [ -> ]Then there are those who have relied on their company's insurance plan all their working life. But when they retire, they find they cannot get any coverage because they have developed medical problems such as high blood pressure or diabetes.

The relevant authority is dragging its foot to implement portable insurance plan.
As more PMEs left their company, whether due to retirement, by choice or not by choice, the impact will become bigger.
(11-11-2012, 07:40 PM)wsreader Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-11-2012, 09:19 AM)Musicwhiz Wrote: [ -> ]Then there are those who have relied on their company's insurance plan all their working life. But when they retire, they find they cannot get any coverage because they have developed medical problems such as high blood pressure or diabetes.

The relevant authority is dragging its foot to implement portable insurance plan.
As more PMEs left their company, whether due to retirement, by choice or not by choice, the impact will become bigger.

That is an issue to rely solely on company insurance for medical coverage.

Newly recruited employee's medical insurance coverage will contain exclusion(s) of his/her existing illnesses if any
(11-11-2012, 07:40 PM)wsreader Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-11-2012, 09:19 AM)Musicwhiz Wrote: [ -> ]Then there are those who have relied on their company's insurance plan all their working life. But when they retire, they find they cannot get any coverage because they have developed medical problems such as high blood pressure or diabetes.

The relevant authority is dragging its foot to implement portable insurance plan.
As more PMEs left their company, whether due to retirement, by choice or not by choice, the impact will become bigger.

Aren't the shield plans considered portable?
Employers can make use of the shield plans framework to implement portable medical benefits and enjoy up to 1% additional tax benefit.
I found the following link from online search after muck's question :

http://www.mom.gov.sg/employment-practic...efits.aspx
(12-11-2012, 10:15 AM)wsreader Wrote: [ -> ]Employers can make use of the shield plans framework to implement portable medical benefits and enjoy up to 1% additional tax benefit.
I found the following link from online search after muck's question :

http://www.mom.gov.sg/employment-practic...efits.aspx

Thanks for the info, but few companies implemented that as far as i know.

Not sure what are the hurdles to implement?
(12-11-2012, 10:33 AM)CityFarmer Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-11-2012, 10:15 AM)wsreader Wrote: [ -> ]Employers can make use of the shield plans framework to implement portable medical benefits and enjoy up to 1% additional tax benefit.
I found the following link from online search after muck's question :

http://www.mom.gov.sg/employment-practic...efits.aspx

Thanks for the info, but few companies implemented that as far as i know.

Not sure what are the hurdles to implement?
The reason for many companies not implementing is more expensive. My employer company did consider implementing but abandon it due to cost.
(12-11-2012, 11:02 AM)Bibi Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-11-2012, 10:33 AM)CityFarmer Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-11-2012, 10:15 AM)wsreader Wrote: [ -> ]Employers can make use of the shield plans framework to implement portable medical benefits and enjoy up to 1% additional tax benefit.
I found the following link from online search after muck's question :

http://www.mom.gov.sg/employment-practic...efits.aspx

Thanks for the info, but few companies implemented that as far as i know.

Not sure what are the hurdles to implement?
The reason for many companies not implementing is more expensive. My employer company did consider implementing but abandon it due to cost.

Shield Plans are national plans that covered all the citizens from 0 to 80?? years old while company plans only cover its employees.
If the company is small, most likely the company will not offer hospitalisation benefits out of working hours.
If the company is big enough to negotiate outpatient and hospitalisation benefits, then I suppose the cost will be lower than national shield plans. Most employees are below 65 years old and above 20 years old. They are at the age that the probability of hospitalisation is low.
Without sufficient tax incentives, there is no reason for an employer to implement.
It can be used as a leash to retain staff, ie, if u jump ship and join another company, u lost the benefit.
(12-11-2012, 11:56 AM)wsreader Wrote: [ -> ]Without sufficient tax incentives, there is no reason for an employer to implement.
It can be used as a leash to retain staff, ie, if u jump ship and join another company, u lost the benefit.

Instead of subsidizing companies on their P&L, a better use of the money is to improve the national shield-plan for all

Choices of basic medishield plans, enhanced medishield plans and private medical plans are available for individual, instead of relying on company insurance.
Pages: 1 2