Not sure change or not change is better.
For my investment journey, it's kind of keep learning, keep testing, refine/polish and then repeat the cycle again - focusing on pruning the weeds while tending a flower bed.
Methods/principles is like a chest of drawers with tools.
Each time, when a drawer is open, there are something new to learn.
Sometime, what I learn can be put into practice but most of the time, it's just not for me (too tough, too difficult, too time consuming).
Occasionally, there will be ah-ha moment that explains something that I couldn't figure out and naturally it becomes part of my experimentation.
In the end, I found out that there are not really one methods but multiple ways/tools to try out and gain from the investment world. Different tools can be used/required to address a particular opportunities. I have no doubt that if you only using one tools and focusing on polishing the same tools, the rewards could be tremendous. In fact, I suspects that even the best market operator might had been using/testing multiple tools in their life, however, likely
only one of the tool is most successful and most rewarding in terms of returns.
Of course, given a chest of drawers, the question is really which one is the most rewarding and also emotionally satisfying too?
For me, value investing is definitely the one.
Unfortunately, I am still wondering why this make sense to my 10 baggers (Bestworld) but it does not make sense for my favorite stocks (Micro Mechanics)?
P.S. Bestworld was brought with good MOS. Micro Mechanics was brought without MOS.
Stay home and stay safe, everyone.