ValueBuddies.com : Value Investing Forum - Singapore, Hong Kong, U.S.

Full Version: UMS Holdings
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Good point from ngsengkia. In order to verify your hypothesis, you will just need to check whether AMAT is selling stakes their other investor companies.

I wonder why the selling has not triggered a query from SGX?

Anyway I have another theory which is IPT (interested party transactions), whereby AMAT plans to sell out UMS, new merged co with TEL acquire UMS fully at a lower price then. It will just need to give upside of 20% at current share price compared to when at 90c/70c.

One red flag is for AMAT to sell, why do they need to sell publicly and not share transfer to some other investors? Perhaps no takers?

Not vested but things look interesting now. I disagree with Zelphon. Technology transfer is really difficult especially in terms of reliability or quality control.
http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/eFORM1_V...eID=302120

Very happening, Andy sold 658 shares y'day to round down his holdings.

Newly Trading Vested
GG
(20-06-2014, 05:31 PM)greengiraffe Wrote: [ -> ]http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/eFORM1_V...eID=302120

Very happening, Andy sold 658 shares y'day to round down his holdings.

Newly Trading Vested
GG

Seriously why dont he buy 342 shares instead. It rounds up nicer. Lol
(20-06-2014, 05:31 PM)greengiraffe Wrote: [ -> ]http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/eFORM1_V...eID=302120

Very happening, Andy sold 658 shares y'day to round down his holdings.

Newly Trading Vested
GG

Looks like he's a perfectionist.
(20-06-2014, 05:22 PM)mrEngineer Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder why the selling has not triggered a query from SGX?

Anyway I have another theory which is IPT (interested party transactions), whereby AMAT plans to sell out UMS, new merged co with TEL acquire UMS fully at a lower price then. It will just need to give upside of 20% at current share price compared to when at 90c/70c.

One red flag is for AMAT to sell, why do they need to sell publicly and not share transfer to some other investors? Perhaps no takers?

There seems to be a new process that they can pre-inform SGX about what they were going to do.

UMS up or down 100% is not going to make a dent on AMAT's PnL. Most here don't think PnL is a big consideration either way.
(20-06-2014, 05:52 PM)Tiggerbee Wrote: [ -> ]
(20-06-2014, 05:31 PM)greengiraffe Wrote: [ -> ]http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/eFORM1_V...eID=302120

Very happening, Andy sold 658 shares y'day to round down his holdings.

Newly Trading Vested
GG

Looks like he's a perfectionist.
Perhaps by rounding down, he's signalling that he's done selling!
(20-06-2014, 06:07 PM)twsoon Wrote: [ -> ]Perhaps by rounding down, he's signalling that he's done selling!

Rounding up would have signaled that he's done selling.

Rounding down is just weird.
(20-06-2014, 06:10 PM)Aldar Wrote: [ -> ]
(20-06-2014, 06:07 PM)twsoon Wrote: [ -> ]Perhaps by rounding down, he's signalling that he's done selling!

Rounding up would have signaled that he's done selling.

Rounding down is just weird.

To increase liquidity in the odd-lot counter. Ha-ha !

(vested)
greengiraffe Wrote:http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/eFORM1_V...eID=302120 Very happening, Andy sold 658 shares y'day to round down his holdings. Newly Trading Vested GG

With this very small sale if odd lots, it would suggest that the wave pf selling by CEO is over.

(Recently vested)