05-03-2014, 10:26 PM
The following comments and projections (based on average historical figures of the last 4 years) have been made after closer examination of the FY2013 results – as always, an analysis is as good as its underlying assumptions. Comments are most welcomed.
Revenue (SGD ‘000) (Semicon + CEM)
FY2010 = 129,033 (Semicon = 91%)
FY2011 = 114,427 (Semicon = 93%)
FY2012 = 113,212 (Semicon = 95%)
FY2013 = 120,486 (Semicon = 98%) ; (4Q2013 = 34,445 = 28.6% of FY2013)
4-Y-AVG = 119,290 ( 4-year-average)
Revenue (SGD ‘000) (Semicon only)
FY2010 = 117,500 ( 1.7% of SSG revenue of USD 5.304 billion)
FY2011 = 106,700 ( 1.5% of SSG revenue of USD 5.415 billion)
FY2012 = 107,200 ( 1.6% of SSG revenue of USD 5,536 billion)
FY2013 = 119,200 ( 1.9% of SSG revenue of USD 4,775 billion); (yearly semicon revenue at historical 4-year-high)
GPM (Gross Profit Margin)
FY2010 = 56.0%
FY2011 = 55.8%
FY2012 = 49.3%
FY2013 = 53.9% (4Q2013 = 62.5% , Highest quarterly GPM in the last 4 years, see attached excel file)
4-Y-Avg = 54%
NPM (Net Profit Margin)
FY2010 = 22.3%
FY2011 = 24.2%
FY2012 = 15.0%
FY2013 = 24.0% (4Q2013 = 31.9%, Highest quarterly NPM in the last 4 years, see historical excel file)
4-Y-AVG = 21.4%
Operating cash flows before working capital changes : Approximately equals EBITDA (SGD’000)
FY2010 = 48,791
FY2011 = 38,686
FY2012 = 33,603
FY2013 = 40,296 (4Q2013 = 14,492, Second Highest quarterly EBITDA in the last 4 years; = 36% of FY2013, see attached excel file)
4-Y-AVG = 40,344 (4-year-Average)
EBITDA Margin (EBITDA / Revenue)
FY2010 = 37.8%
FY2011 = 33.8%
FY2012 = 29.7%
FY2013 = 33.4% (4Q2013 = 42.1%, Highest quarterly EBITDA Margin in the last 4 years, see attached excel file)
4-Y-AVG = 33.8%
Tax Paid (SGD’000):
FY2010 = 4,544
FY2011 = 3,683
FY2012 = 1,687
FY2013 = 3,832
4-Y-AVG = 3,437 ( 4-year-average)
Change in working capital (SGD’000):
FY2010 = -17,258
FY2011 = + 5,231
FY2012 = + 2,273
FY2013 = - 10,262
4-Y-AVG = - 5,004 (4-year-average)
Capex in PPE (SGD’000):
FY2010 = 7,621
FY2011 = 7,481
FY2012 = 1,994
FY2013 = 1,747
4-Y-AVG = 4,711 (4-year-average)
Comments:
1) Revenue contribution from CEM has been decreasing as a percentage of total revenue. Customer concentration risk (One Industry, one customer) is increasing
2) Semicon revenue as % of SSG revenue is trending up especially in 4Q2013/FY2013, this could be attributed to technology trends are playing to AMAT’s strengths in precision materials engineering, with FinFET and 3D-NAND being the way forward, more PVD process steps are needed – more Endura are needed.
3) I do agree with Nick, relying on net profit margin alone to gauge profitability does not always provide a clear picture, as the margin ratio never offer perfect information – they are only as good as the quality and accuracy of the input data. Since, UMS does “tweak” non-cash (expense/gain) items such as depreciation, FX gain/loss, inventories impairment etc to reduce/boost net profit - a better profitibility margin measure would be the EBITDA margin, which surprisingly as in the case of UMS, has high correlation with NPM - despite of “tweaking”, high NPM does correlate to high EBITDA margin.
4) For the purpose of computing EBITDA margin, on closer examination, in the case of UMS, EBITDA could be approximated by using Operating Cash Flow before working capital changes (OCFBWCC)
5) With no debt and assuming no more borrowing,
FCF (available to Equity) = OCFBWCC (or EBITDA) – change in working capital – capex - tax
Moving forwards, projected FCF (available to Equity) , based on AVERAGE historical figures over the last 4 years = 40,344 – 5,004 – 4,711 – 3,437 = 27,192 = SGD 7.9 cents per share, which looks pretty good on 4-year-historical-average-basis. On yearly basis, Revenue and EBITDA Margin over the last 4 years seemed more stable and predictable, as compared to Changes in Working Capital and Capex in PPE - which varied widely on yearly basis.
6) Major potential upside risks : more jobs given to UMS from AMAT (with or without TEL); higher demand for PVD related equipment (Endura)
7) Major potential downside risk : Manufacturing contract not renewed by AMAT
(Vested)
Revenue (SGD ‘000) (Semicon + CEM)
FY2010 = 129,033 (Semicon = 91%)
FY2011 = 114,427 (Semicon = 93%)
FY2012 = 113,212 (Semicon = 95%)
FY2013 = 120,486 (Semicon = 98%) ; (4Q2013 = 34,445 = 28.6% of FY2013)
4-Y-AVG = 119,290 ( 4-year-average)
Revenue (SGD ‘000) (Semicon only)
FY2010 = 117,500 ( 1.7% of SSG revenue of USD 5.304 billion)
FY2011 = 106,700 ( 1.5% of SSG revenue of USD 5.415 billion)
FY2012 = 107,200 ( 1.6% of SSG revenue of USD 5,536 billion)
FY2013 = 119,200 ( 1.9% of SSG revenue of USD 4,775 billion); (yearly semicon revenue at historical 4-year-high)
GPM (Gross Profit Margin)
FY2010 = 56.0%
FY2011 = 55.8%
FY2012 = 49.3%
FY2013 = 53.9% (4Q2013 = 62.5% , Highest quarterly GPM in the last 4 years, see attached excel file)
4-Y-Avg = 54%
NPM (Net Profit Margin)
FY2010 = 22.3%
FY2011 = 24.2%
FY2012 = 15.0%
FY2013 = 24.0% (4Q2013 = 31.9%, Highest quarterly NPM in the last 4 years, see historical excel file)
4-Y-AVG = 21.4%
Operating cash flows before working capital changes : Approximately equals EBITDA (SGD’000)
FY2010 = 48,791
FY2011 = 38,686
FY2012 = 33,603
FY2013 = 40,296 (4Q2013 = 14,492, Second Highest quarterly EBITDA in the last 4 years; = 36% of FY2013, see attached excel file)
4-Y-AVG = 40,344 (4-year-Average)
EBITDA Margin (EBITDA / Revenue)
FY2010 = 37.8%
FY2011 = 33.8%
FY2012 = 29.7%
FY2013 = 33.4% (4Q2013 = 42.1%, Highest quarterly EBITDA Margin in the last 4 years, see attached excel file)
4-Y-AVG = 33.8%
Tax Paid (SGD’000):
FY2010 = 4,544
FY2011 = 3,683
FY2012 = 1,687
FY2013 = 3,832
4-Y-AVG = 3,437 ( 4-year-average)
Change in working capital (SGD’000):
FY2010 = -17,258
FY2011 = + 5,231
FY2012 = + 2,273
FY2013 = - 10,262
4-Y-AVG = - 5,004 (4-year-average)
Capex in PPE (SGD’000):
FY2010 = 7,621
FY2011 = 7,481
FY2012 = 1,994
FY2013 = 1,747
4-Y-AVG = 4,711 (4-year-average)
Comments:
1) Revenue contribution from CEM has been decreasing as a percentage of total revenue. Customer concentration risk (One Industry, one customer) is increasing
2) Semicon revenue as % of SSG revenue is trending up especially in 4Q2013/FY2013, this could be attributed to technology trends are playing to AMAT’s strengths in precision materials engineering, with FinFET and 3D-NAND being the way forward, more PVD process steps are needed – more Endura are needed.
3) I do agree with Nick, relying on net profit margin alone to gauge profitability does not always provide a clear picture, as the margin ratio never offer perfect information – they are only as good as the quality and accuracy of the input data. Since, UMS does “tweak” non-cash (expense/gain) items such as depreciation, FX gain/loss, inventories impairment etc to reduce/boost net profit - a better profitibility margin measure would be the EBITDA margin, which surprisingly as in the case of UMS, has high correlation with NPM - despite of “tweaking”, high NPM does correlate to high EBITDA margin.
4) For the purpose of computing EBITDA margin, on closer examination, in the case of UMS, EBITDA could be approximated by using Operating Cash Flow before working capital changes (OCFBWCC)
5) With no debt and assuming no more borrowing,
FCF (available to Equity) = OCFBWCC (or EBITDA) – change in working capital – capex - tax
Moving forwards, projected FCF (available to Equity) , based on AVERAGE historical figures over the last 4 years = 40,344 – 5,004 – 4,711 – 3,437 = 27,192 = SGD 7.9 cents per share, which looks pretty good on 4-year-historical-average-basis. On yearly basis, Revenue and EBITDA Margin over the last 4 years seemed more stable and predictable, as compared to Changes in Working Capital and Capex in PPE - which varied widely on yearly basis.
6) Major potential upside risks : more jobs given to UMS from AMAT (with or without TEL); higher demand for PVD related equipment (Endura)
7) Major potential downside risk : Manufacturing contract not renewed by AMAT
(Vested)