13-05-2013, 06:13 PM
13-05-2013, 07:56 PM
13-05-2013, 08:29 PM
Anyone accepted her offer of 3.41 besides the two houses?
14-05-2013, 10:00 PM
any buddy here belongs to the last 13.3% minority shareholders? care to share yr tots?
29-05-2013, 11:51 PM
Good bye to WBL as a listed entity...
UE does not intend to maintain the listing status of WBL and will not undertake or support any action for any trading suspension of WBL securities to be lifted.
UE’S OFFER FOR WBL CLOSES SUCCESSFULLY WITH UE AND ITS CONCERT PARTIES HOLDING 96.29%
UE does not intend to maintain the listing status of WBL and will not undertake or support any action for any trading suspension of WBL securities to be lifted.
UE’S OFFER FOR WBL CLOSES SUCCESSFULLY WITH UE AND ITS CONCERT PARTIES HOLDING 96.29%
30-05-2013, 01:41 PM
(29-05-2013, 11:51 PM)KopiKat Wrote: [ -> ]Good bye to WBL as a listed entity...
UE does not intend to maintain the listing status of WBL and will not undertake or support any action for any trading suspension of WBL securities to be lifted.
UE’S OFFER FOR WBL CLOSES SUCCESSFULLY WITH UE AND ITS CONCERT PARTIES HOLDING 96.29%
can anyone clarify this announcement - the Board wishes to highlight that as certain Concert Parties fall within the definition of "public" as defined in the listing manual (the "Listing Manual") of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited (the "SGX-ST"), the percentage shareholding of the Company in the hands of public shareholders remains above 10% as at the close of the UE Offers as required by Rule 723 of the Listing Manual. Accordingly, trading of Stock Units and Convertible Bonds on the SGX-ST will continue.
is there some misrepresentation by the company?
30-05-2013, 10:37 PM
Hi guys, I came across this title on Straits Times "WBL shareholders and STC lack 'common goal'" but I dont have access.
does anyone know what the article said?
does anyone know what the article said?